Twitist Forums
Wrestlemania 31 can be entertaining without undertaker's match ? - Printable Version

+- Twitist Forums (http://twitist.com)
+-- Forum: Facebook forums (/forum-14.html)
+--- Forum: General facebook and life forums (/forum-25.html)
+--- Thread: Wrestlemania 31 can be entertaining without undertaker's match ? (/thread-144658.html)



Wrestlemania 31 can be entertaining without undertaker's match ? - Shahrukh - 04-28-2014 12:03 AM

Lot of peoples are upset with streak's end and i read lot of comments on Facebook like "I m done with wwe , no undertaker no wrestlemania "


- Jack - 04-28-2014 12:06 AM

Lol i dont get it, its not like the WWE is real . They gave the undertaker a long run, fans should be happy that he made it that long without losing.


- There I Said It - 04-28-2014 12:09 AM

People seem to forget that Undertaker wasn't at WrestleMania 10, and that was the one that Shawn Michaels and Razor Ramon had that legendary Ladder Match. The end of the streak isn't the end of the world.


- Patrisha M - 04-28-2014 12:17 AM

WrestleMania XXXI could be entertaining, but it depends on what you like and the creative team's booking decisions. Only time would tell. Fans that say they're done with WWE because Undertaker had his streak ended really should calm down. It's 2014 now so it's time for a change. Let newer wrestlers build their own legacies now.


- lisa - 04-28-2014 12:20 AM

Wrestlemania = The Streak = The Undertaker

I mean, it can be entertaining but it will never be the same without The Phenom.

RIP 21-1


- Doink the Frown - 04-28-2014 12:27 AM

nonsense. life goes on. wwe will move on.. they said the same when hulk moved on all those years ago. wwe is bigger than any one wrestler. at the end of the day the streak was just a 22 year storyline. now its done. move on........


- TACOMcCail - 04-28-2014 12:28 AM

Of course 31 can still be entertaining. There have been 30 wrestlemania's and only 22 of them have had an Undertaker match. On top of that, this whole business about the streak didn't start when he beat Jimmy Snuka. It wasn't until he was about 10 an 0, that that they really started calling attention to it. So for the last 12 years or so, there has been talk of the streak. Before that, he just happened not to have lost at mania and no one really cared.


- snk - 04-28-2014 12:29 AM

for the past few years, the undertaker's matches have been the ones to look forward to. he had some great matches up to the one where he faced triple h in a steel cage. then last year and this year he really couldnt put up a great match for that long