+- Twitist Forums (http://twitist.com)
+-- Forum: Twitter forums (/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: Twitter General help (/forum-6.html)
+--- Thread: Do conservatives tend to blame the victims of crime more often than liberals do? (/thread-44648.html)
Pages: 1 2
Do conservatives tend to blame the victims of crime more often than liberals do? - Thomas H - 11-19-2012 03:09 AM
With all the digging into Treyvon Martins past (including hacking into a deleted twitter feed) not one conservative can post any real explaination of why an unarmed person with no history of violence (despite what the right-wing websites say) would attack somebody (who has a history of violence and a police rap sheet) unprovoked or how 40 minutes after a beating the "victim" of that "savage" beating can be shown to be immaculate and uninjured.
- Tom - 11-19-2012 03:17 AM
No, they'll go with the side that Liberals disagree with. For example, we all know that O.J killed hsi wife and you didn't see conservatives blaming HER.
- Dr. Phil of sh!t - 11-19-2012 03:17 AM
Ahhh yet another all knowing liberal eye witness with all the "facts" appears.
is it being investigated....yes then how about you STFU till the evidence is examined.
- kabuki pacifist - 11-19-2012 03:17 AM
it was obvious to anyone unbiased that both of them were looking for trouble.....
- polarisoris65 - 11-19-2012 03:17 AM
No but we do like to hear the truth and the rest of the story. before we speak .......never heard of a white hispanic before this incident ... Liberals always tying to demonize other political View points and put people in a racial category
- Jesus Porkchop - 11-19-2012 03:17 AM
It depends, if the victim is of a visible minority or a rape victim then clearly they are to blame for what happened.
However, if the victim is a white person, especially a white person of upper middle class status or above, then they deserve to have the hammer of justice brought down upon whoever wronged them, unless the perpetrator was also white, and of a higher class status.
It can be a complex system, but here's a simple way to keep it in check.
The higher a person's class status * the paleness of their skin = preferred treatment
the lower a person's class status * the darkness of their skin = straight to jail, even if they were the one victimized.
- Stitches - 11-19-2012 03:17 AM
Republicans are noted for backing losers.
I don't understand the uproar about what they do. And how.
Child molesters. Hidden homosexuals. They are the coldest group Ive even known.
- Sagebrush - 11-19-2012 03:17 AM
With no history of violence? Immaculate and uninjured? Martin, a victim? Whew, are you smoking or on happy juice?
What is your agenda? Are you one of those race baiting pimps? How come Liberals always make the culprit the victim? Take 911 where those terrorists were just the frustrated victims. Or the Duke Lacrosse team were the perpetrators of a rape. Your blatant disregard of the facts just proves who you are.
- electricpole - 11-19-2012 03:17 AM
This question is yet another politicization of an event that everyone knows nearly nothing about in fact, and what they do know has been filtered by the media with their individual biases. It's being used as a spring board to advance individual ideologies, nothing more than fuel to feed the engines of political agendas.
If any one truly has an interest in the facts of the individual case, purely for the sake of knowing what happened, they will have to exercise patience and be mature enough to realize that unless you were there, you will never have the full story.
- WickedGoose© - 11-19-2012 03:17 AM
Not really...but conservatives DO tend to believe in a "binary" vision of the world, where someone is either 100% guilty or 100% innocent, which in reality is RARELY the case...and they typically pre-decide which is which, regardless of any evidence...
They are a "less-educated" population, so this helps to make their lives simpler...