Why can't candidates not show faces until after its over so no one votes on looks? - Printable Version +- Twitist Forums (http://twitist.com) +-- Forum: Twitter forums (/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Twitter abbreviations (/forum-4.html) +--- Thread: Why can't candidates not show faces until after its over so no one votes on looks? (/thread-46337.html) |
Why can't candidates not show faces until after its over so no one votes on looks? - ERROR - 11-27-2012 06:43 AM I mean, if they didn't show their faces then they wouldn't get voted in on their skin color (not being racist, but a lot of people on twitter were voting for obama because of his skin color) or if they look old or ugly? - greatunderwear765 - 11-27-2012 06:51 AM Americans won't even vote for a guy with a beard, because they think he's hiding something. You want to bag them? Ok deal as long as you use dry cleaner bags. - Caleb - 11-27-2012 06:51 AM That's the point. If you're handsome you're more likely to be globally liked. America would rather pick someone who is a 10 with an I.Q. Of 70 over a man who is a 5 and the I.Q. Of Einstein. This government is fucked up. I would like to see people vote based on political views than physical looks. |