Twitist Forums
Why did Obama let the Social security number Identification case go into default yesterday? - Printable Version

+- Twitist Forums (http://twitist.com)
+-- Forum: General Social Media & Marketing Forums (/forum-8.html)
+--- Forum: General Social Media questions (/forum-9.html)
+--- Thread: Why did Obama let the Social security number Identification case go into default yesterday? (/thread-70031.html)



Why did Obama let the Social security number Identification case go into default yesterday? - John W - 05-01-2013 05:47 PM

Obama has a lawyer


- Max Hoopla - 05-01-2013 05:51 PM

Link please.


- courtesyflush - 05-01-2013 06:01 PM

what ?

Is this part of the birther conspiracy ?


- Tron - 05-01-2013 06:09 PM

Why do people like you assume that Obama, or any president, micro manages everything that happens in Washington? That's ridiculous.


- RLP - 05-01-2013 06:16 PM

HE CANNOT DEFEND IT!

******

This being the case, I asked Daniels to guide me through the data mine field and help me ascertain what we know for sure about the world’s best-known Social Security number – 042-68-4425.

“All I can say,” says Daniels of 042-68-4425, “is that it’s phony and [Obama] has been using it, with it first appearing on his Selective Service document in 1980.”

Daniels sent me a copy of the hand-written application of the individual who held the number immediately before Obama’s, 042-68-4424. The applicant, Thomas Wood, died at age 19, which is why his information is available.

Wood’s Social Security number was issued sometime between March and May of 1977. Obama would turn 16 in August of that year. Wood lived on Glenview Drive in Newington, Conn., the state from which all “042s” applied. Obama lived in Hawaii.

True to form, the left-leaning media set out to undermine the Social Security controversy and ridicule the investigators. Revealing, however, is the weakness of the response.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2011/03/275861/#rOqHURsqEwxU7pAj.99


- Whatever4 - 05-01-2013 06:27 PM

He didn't. Judge England certainly hasn't issued a notice of default -- Orly Taitz filed a request for a default, the court didnt order one. Her "proposed order" isn't signed by a judge. The only signatures are Orly Taitz and the person who sent the document to all the parties. The title even says "Request for a default judgment and a Proposed Default Judgment."

Obama hasn't even been properly served in this case, so he can't possibly have defaulted. Taitz claimed to have served Obama in his private capacity -- but she hasn't personally served him. She DID serve the Attorney General on January 4, which means she served Obama in his capacity as President. In that case, he gets 60 days to respond.

@RLP --Susan Daniel's errors. http://www.thefogbow.com/special-reports/social-security-number/

You're going to be shocked when this case is dismissed -- like 200 cases before it -- aren't you?