Why do Iibs tout the benefits of a govt provided military then fight to cut its funding? - Printable Version +- Twitist Forums (http://twitist.com) +-- Forum: General Social Media & Marketing Forums (/forum-8.html) +--- Forum: Social Marketing (/forum-10.html) +--- Thread: Why do Iibs tout the benefits of a govt provided military then fight to cut its funding? (/thread-73334.html) |
Why do Iibs tout the benefits of a govt provided military then fight to cut its funding? - IChee - 05-27-2013 09:58 AM - Davids - 05-27-2013 10:07 AM They don't - Drixnot - 05-27-2013 10:09 AM military pork is still pork. - Jason - 05-27-2013 10:10 AM straw man I know I dont to hell with the military civil defence coastguard police thatll do - StephenG - 05-27-2013 10:12 AM Its the waste and the rip off by the GOP controlled military industrial complex. Gop greed once again - George S - 05-27-2013 10:21 AM Liberals, progressives, and socialists don't have much respect for military except as it serves their doctrines. Conservatives show it more respect but traditionally they want it for its standard purpose: to secure the nation, its resources, and its commerce. Below are accurate definitions. Today in the US most progressives and some socialists fraudulently call themselves "liberal." True liberalism advocates: individual freedom, weak government, and free markets. Progressives advocate: social concern, omniscient government, and controlled markets. Socialism advocates: social responsibility, omnipresent government, and collective markets. Conservatism advocates: moral responsibility, strong government, and protected markets ("neo-cons" with international businesses have adopted freer market policies). - Luckyafternoon376 - 05-27-2013 10:25 AM To feed the Military Industrial Complex. |