CHALLENGE:Walzer on free market economy and spheres of justice? - Printable Version +- Twitist Forums (http://twitist.com) +-- Forum: General Social Media & Marketing Forums (/forum-8.html) +--- Forum: Social Marketing (/forum-10.html) +--- Thread: CHALLENGE:Walzer on free market economy and spheres of justice? (/thread-97184.html) |
CHALLENGE:Walzer on free market economy and spheres of justice? - question marc??? - 02-19-2014 12:25 PM How can Walzer be pro-free-market and at the same time criticize what he calls "Fetishism of Commodities" which is described as "Commodities mediate membership" Ownership and consumption define social membership in a community. How "free" can the free market be in Walzer's conception since he gives a list of "blocked exchanges?" What do these mean and why in his philosophy of justice, are warranted? - GreenManorite - 02-19-2014 12:28 PM Not familiar with Waltzer, but most economists realize that there are certain situations where markets fail: 1)Public goods. (non-excludable, non-rival goods) 2)Natural monopolies due to economies of scale. 3)Significant externalities. If you define "pro-free market" as being for markets when they are in the public good, then clearly there are times where you want to limit markets. If you define "pro-free market" as being for markets, regardless of the public good then you'd better pray you're never on the wrong end of a failing market. Markets aren't always the most efficient (or just) way of doing things, they are simply a tool that tends to work well the majority of the time (excludable, rival goods without significant externalities). Walzer is probably idenifying what he views as a negative externality in some markets, which he feels should be addressed by some non-market means. |