This Forum has been archived there is no more new posts or threads ... use this link to report any abusive content
==> Report abusive content in this page <==
Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What percent of a ethnic groups Y DNA has to be mixed for them to be biracial or mixed race?
01-25-2013, 09:04 AM
Post: #3
 
good questions for wich there are no answers... science is no longer even allowed to use the term race at all...dancing around the term with "population groups" or other such politically correct terms

agendas effects politics wich determines policies that controls funding of science whose facts are then "interpreted" to match the agenda.

Forgone conclusions is what is persued, and you have a layer of liberal "social science" that determines what empirical science is both allowed to do and say.

and the artificial social agenda thats promoted is that "race is not real"

so there is no interest in truly determing these things.


_________________

take mestizos for example.... while they are of mixed heritage, are they a unique race?

if you have someone white and idian pair up and have a child.... that child will be bi-racial. genetically speaking, that child would have a harder time finding a genetic match from either white or indian people should they need a bone marrow or organ transplant... a bi-racial person is a unique mixture that is UNLIKE either race.

but someone mestizo, where the admixture took place generations ago would not have such a problem... there is a racial community where genetic compatability is found. and that community would not provide any more compatability for a "new" bi-racial even though the same races are involved, they are as ive said a unique mixture to themsleves. isnt that interesting?

should a bi-racial white/indian pair off with someone white....immediately you will have a loss of many indian traits with that child, if pairing with whites continues the indian traits become negligble... you can reverse the situation and genetic traits will lean to the other race.

but with mestizos you wont really see that, because the admixture took place with so many people and so many generations.... but white and indian traits were lost along the way and various new admixtures were passed along.... left alone, mestizos will never "go back" to either being just white or just indian.... you wont see a particular set of racial traits eventually become negligible the way you wold see with a bi-racial.

wouldnt that "qualify" as a unique racial group?.... why are we calling them "mixed" at all? while yes, they are of mixed heritage.... they arent like an individual mixed person who has a parent or grandparant that was another race.

you can ask the same kind of thing of somalis, arabs, eurasians.... its POLITICS and political correctness that doesnt want this clarified... its "prefereable" to simply classify ALL people as "transitory" in an effort to Dismiss the idea of race alltogether....rather than view people as legitimate racial groups.

at what point does a group of people become a unique "sustainable" racial group... or just a bunch of mixed people that will eventually go back to being one or the other. we dont really know.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
[] - Sarah - 01-25-2013, 09:04 AM
[] - Hello There - 01-25-2013 09:04 AM
[] - brother_in_magic - 01-25-2013, 09:04 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)