This Forum has been archived there is no more new posts or threads ... use this link to report any abusive content
==> Report abusive content in this page <==
Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Was it unnecessary for more than 60millions of civilians and soldiers to die in the two World wars?
02-21-2013, 03:18 AM
Post: #6
 
-To say that their sacrifice was a waste is...a disappointing, and to some, a mildly offensive stance. Was it tragic, of course. Was the loss of life necessary to stop tyrannical fascism and religious genocide...Yeah probably.

-I predict that WW III will not result in any deaths. No one on this planet would benefit from global nuclear holocaust; no one wants that. WW III will be fought by economists, with all the nations trying to bankrupt one an other.

-It will inevitably be fought using the internet as a weapon. So, in a sense, perhaps. By eliminating the internet, you disarm your enemy. Will social media be able to stop it...maybe in terms of psychological warfare; spreading propaganda, organizing social unrest etc. However, the people "calling the shots" probably won't be influenced, and I doubt you'll be able to Tweet them to death.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
[] - Mark - 02-21-2013, 03:18 AM
[] - Jesse - 02-21-2013, 03:18 AM
[] - Enrique - 02-21-2013, 03:18 AM
[] - Dumb - 02-21-2013, 03:18 AM
[] - George Harrison - 02-21-2013 03:18 AM
[] - Shawncarey - 02-21-2013, 03:18 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)