![](http://headlineslist.com/images/banner.gif)
Was it unnecessary for more than 60millions of civilians and soldiers to die in the two World wars?
|
02-21-2013, 03:18 AM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
-To say that their sacrifice was a waste is...a disappointing, and to some, a mildly offensive stance. Was it tragic, of course. Was the loss of life necessary to stop tyrannical fascism and religious genocide...Yeah probably.
-I predict that WW III will not result in any deaths. No one on this planet would benefit from global nuclear holocaust; no one wants that. WW III will be fought by economists, with all the nations trying to bankrupt one an other. -It will inevitably be fought using the internet as a weapon. So, in a sense, perhaps. By eliminating the internet, you disarm your enemy. Will social media be able to stop it...maybe in terms of psychological warfare; spreading propaganda, organizing social unrest etc. However, the people "calling the shots" probably won't be influenced, and I doubt you'll be able to Tweet them to death. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Was it unnecessary for more than 60millions of civilians and soldiers to die in the two World wars? - Dolphin Lover8-88 - 02-21-2013, 03:10 AM
[] - George Harrison - 02-21-2013 03:18 AM
[] - Shawncarey - 02-21-2013, 03:18 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)