Realists: Is this what we're up against?

[Ottawa Mike]

I'm not sure what you see here (you accuse me of seeing gremlins under the bed quite often). I see a long time anti-wind activist, John Droz Jr., drafting his own vision of launching an anti-wind power PR campaign. I also see a confidential memo with no indication of how it was obtained and by omission no real care either.

Besides being old news and last year's minor talking point among the more ardent AGW believers, there's not much else here.

Actually, it sounds a lot like the core climate gang from the Climategate emails with their own PR campaign to push AGW. Except we have evidence of that being implemented while in your case you have the ramblings of one person.

If one man is your idea of a conspiracy, well I don't know what to say. Why don't you read his opinions about wind power and attack them instead of promoting weak conspiracy theories? http://www.masterresource.org/2012/10/20...asons-why/

Edit: I notice again that you keep your Q&A private. Interesting behavior from a conspiracy theorist. However, I did find this: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...401AAlwzXR

Another question of yours implying a conspiracy from a "leaked" memo with no mention of how it was obtained or the fact that these people and organizations are private entities. I've got to say for someone who accuses others of cherry-picking and seeing boogeymen under the bed and lamenting about taking things out of context and railing against the "theft" of the Climategate emails, you're quite a piece of work.

_______________________________________________
Edit2: Okay, so this is a right wing think tank not liking wind power and a left wing think tank not liking that stance. And you're taking one side over the other, just like you always do: http://ca.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind...325AAAEly7

I'm not even sure what this has to do with climate science. BTW, without AGW, wind power would be years away from being a good idea. Did you know that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is actually allowing an exception to a wind turbine project to kill bald eagles? All for a good cause I suppose.