Will Twitter prove remote viewing true?

[wushuboy001]

I am intested in the results. The experiment is too many flaws to be called "proof", but it could be good cause for further investigation.

some problems
The odds of one person hitting 3 locations might be 1 in 125, but what he isn't saying is that if multiple people are guessing the odds of one person hitting 3 locations is dramatically less. If 25 people participate, then the odds of one hitting 3 locations is 1 in 5, which is like guessing one Renner card and declaring yourself psychic. If 125 people participate one is bound to hit 3 locations. So really we wont know if the people who hit are real remote viewers or just lucky.

There is no control group and experiment group to compare random guesses to remote viewing guesses. They are all lumped into one group.

I am making the assumption that Richard Wiseman is on the up and up, but he might not be. The experiment actually sounds bias to succeed, which makes sense since its in Wisemans best interest to provide proof that psychic abilities exist.