This Forum has been archived there is no more new posts or threads ... use this link to report any abusive content
==> Report abusive content in this page <==
Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What about a tough kind of cricket with 22 players instead of 11 players in 50 overs in each side ?
04-08-2014, 04:46 AM
Post: #1
What about a tough kind of cricket with 22 players instead of 11 players in 50 overs in each side ?
What do you think will happen ? Do you think this format will be a success or failure ? Answer whatever you feel ? I am just asking for an opinion and want to hear your view of this scenario called "tough cricket" .DO NOT TAKE MY QUESTION SERIOUSLY !!! I know it's never going to happen like that.Just describe your opinion.



NOTE IDIOT & FACEBOOK PRIVACY INVADER FLAT TRACK BULLY NOT ALLOWED TO ANSWER

Word of caution for all yahoo users FLAT TRACK BULLY is a privacy invador of your facebook profiles and will post private details of yours if he disagrees with you.He is a sick guy and I am after him.What did you post about me FLAT TRACK BULLY in sachin kambli question ? I am after him and everyone please keep him off else your privacy is invaded too !!!

Ads

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
What about a tough kind of cricket with 22 players instead of 11 players in 50 overs in each side ? - Maan J Bhatia - 04-08-2014 04:46 AM
[] - FLAT TRACK BULLY - 04-08-2014, 04:51 AM
[] - Green Top Bully - 04-08-2014, 05:01 AM
[] - Abhishek - 04-08-2014, 05:02 AM
[] - Bill P - 04-08-2014, 05:03 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)