![](http://headlineslist.com/images/banner.gif)
By endorsing Facebooks new gender options has GLAAD harmed some of those it claims to support and shown poor ethics?
|
04-28-2014, 07:34 PM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
I think you're making a stink over nothing. The key word here is "options". People now have a wide range of OPTIONS from which to pick. They even have the option not to pick any and keep just "male" or "female". You may consider some of the labels "medicalized", but some people do in fact identify with these labels you despise. I get where you're coming from as I simply identify as female. I consider transsexualism a medical condition, not an identity. But others feel differently and they must have that option available to them. That's what these options are about, giving individuals the freedom to self-identify. If you don't like them... don't use them. It's really that simple.
. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
By endorsing Facebooks new gender options has GLAAD harmed some of those it claims to support and shown poor ethics? - kindday977 - 04-28-2014, 07:22 PM
[] - hissingface669 - 04-28-2014 07:34 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)