Global warming has been stopped for 16 years. Why do some say it is a 1 year trend?

[Cephalopod]

Because your " example" is a 1 year example, not a long trend!!

Let me explain by some simple mathematics, the original shelf is 100%, it loses 60% over a period if years, thus it leaves only 40% but in one. Year it increases by 60%, but 60% of 40% is only 24% so its only 64% of its original quantity.
That's why this one single element doesn't explain the far more complex Climate change!

I'm going with the vast majority of science, like NASA and the Royal Society than the plebs from the DM.

Don't you think it's strange that those against CC are almost entirely NOT scientists??
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_...ate_change
http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus

Please don't ention research grants, those who go on about them have plainly Never applied for a grant! From SeRC or NERC in the UK. And no, you don't need government grants, I'm a Mathmatician and I have NEVER had to mention CC in an application, what a stupid lie!

Finally to the bull about " liberals", this is Science is doesnt do conservative/ liberal it just does Science, and what did the Scientists Margaret Thatcher think??
http://grist.org/climate-energy/how-that...te-action/

"A year before, she shocked the U.N. general assembly in New York by issuing a challenge: “The evidence is there. The damage is being done. What do we, the international community, do about it?” The news story in the New York Times ran with the headline: “Thatcher Urges Pact On Climate.” She called for the U.N. to ratify a treaty by … 1992."
She's hardly a liberal!!