Why don't we see the atmosphere warm at the South Pole in response to increased CO2 concentration?

[Hey Dook]

Instead of cutting and pasting tons of irrelevant mish-mash and technical mumbo jumbo you don't understand, from anti-science sites, how about explaining your "question."
WHAT actually IS the difference (if there indeed IS ANY significant difference at all) between the warming in Antarctica vs the Arctic?
IF this difference is somehow important (and WHY should it be? WHY should the global average temperature trend be equally adhered to regionally?) what the Heck is it?
20% more temperature increase at North vs South?
50% more?
Over what time period?
According to which source?

Otherwise, the assumption will very logically be that this is just more anti-science deceit (which you clearly have penchant for) "disguised" through a fog of irrelevancy.

Edit: DaveH, WHO says the temperature hasn't warmed at Antarctica "at all"? Has any bonafide climate scientist specializing in temperature come to that conclusion? "Your" "data" surely doesn't indicate that. I lean harder than before to the most likely logical assumption here: you are flinging denier BS as usual.