Do you think people have a more strict impression of what a woman's "nature" should be?

[Chaos Theatre V2]

Than a man's

First and foremost: No ranting answers please, you know who you are.

I ask this question because *in my experience* of perusing the internet, people who have a special interest in whoring over men's achievements (which are, let's remind ourselves, not theirs specifically and so not theirs to brag about) constantly pull facts and figures out their ar$e that supposedly support men being more likely to "break away from nature" and create/invent.

However, I see an equal amount of people (mostly men) going on about how their ideal woman is feminine, sweet, agreeable, attuned to her "proper nature." People of both sexes, who invent and create things, are almost none of these. You have to push yourself beyond perceived limits to achieve things. So how do these type of people expect to experience more women like this when they purposefully surround themselves with silly ideals?
I don't see it as a rant, especially not when I have selected and displayed hypocritical behaviours of some men as a basis for this question.
@chick b

Without getting into the logistics of what constitutes genius anyway, there have been PLENTY of female geniuses and inventors, all you have to do is know where to read (or just open your eyes) There is no use trying to pretend it hasn't and doesn't happen when it DOES.

Besides, did YOU invent anything?