Is there someone on Examiner.com who focuses on the subject of Wikipedia?

[Moses]

Well, there's this one guy... <_<

There's also a fellow named Santo who reports on social media stories in a more general way, but by contrast, there are no Examiner.com reporters who have a specific critical focus on either Google, Facebook, or Twitter, arguably the only three websites that are both as controversial and as heavily-visited as Wikipedia. All four sites have similar issues with respect to user privacy and (except for Twitter) questionable management practices, but the nature of Wikipedia's content-acquisition model is such that it probably generates far more scandal, "drama," and general cultural damage than the other three sites combined.

Obviously there's little that can be determined trend-wise by simply counting the number of Examiner.com reporters who are focused critically on a particular subject area or a particular website, but if I had to guess I would say that the future will see more, not fewer, such reporters.