Will people look back on the early 2010s they way they do with the mid '90s as one of the weakest periods ever?

[Jeroen Leijten]

Really, WWE is so lame right now, it's untrue. WWE had a weak roster and storylines in the mid 1990s, but I'd much rather have that time back than what we have now. We have an unbelievably stale franchise player who sits on top squashing everything, a mid-card WWE Champion, five other utterly meaningless titles, potential stars like Dolph Ziggler and Daniel Bryan being given little and a major reliance on the stars of yesteryear, incessant social media promotion and recaps, and an insane PC madness environment where your favorite wrestler could get released for breathing the wrong way.

WWE fudgin' sucks. Anyone else?

Anyone else?

[?]

Yes!

[BallzDeep]

Your right. This I would have to say is the weakest it's ever been. Anyone can win a title now and the titles don't mean shit anymore. The WWE Championship looks like a piece of bling 50 Cent would wear and winning the Royal Rumble doesn't matter anymore cause you start the show and win the WHC in 18 seconds. They need to change this around, screw the PG crap, and most of all fuck you Linda, because of her campaign to get office, she's forgetting what made her and Vince is a dumb ass to stoop to the level to make it PG so that her opponents won't bash her for running a wrestling franchise.

[narrowvase835]

Thank God im not alone. 2010 was probably one of WWEs weakest years and man it just sucked

[Crazy Babe]

Posibly, I can't really say any of that is un-true!

[Martin]

I agree, I remember having big parties with all my friends every month for the PPV during the attitude era as they were something to look forward too, now RAW had better matches in the attitude era than the PPV'S do now days, and even though it was scripted there was still a sense of not knowing what was going to happen now it's all so predictable and the same old people fighting for the championships boring and don't even get me started on Ryback..lol..