This Forum has been archived there is no more new posts or threads ... use this link to report any abusive content
==> Report abusive content in this page <==
Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
By allowing it to define whom and how much we hate, have we granted the Social Construct far too much power?
03-24-2014, 10:26 AM
Post: #1
By allowing it to define whom and how much we hate, have we granted the Social Construct far too much power?
To define; the Social Construct is the existence of media as a collective human consciousness, by which Americans receive and are influenced by events that occur elsewhere in the nation. It is conducted by critical spokespersons who establish socio-political factions, where all of whom state what their "side" thinks as the social norm, and polarize those who subscribe to their side by assassinating the character of the opposition.

The danger of the Social Construct lies within how a topic can go "viral" and attract national discourse, no matter how trivial and stupid it is. The Social Construct delegates what is "viral" by promoting it to a few subscribers, and through these subscribers, the topic quickly spreads like a virus from person to person, taking control as the "popular" topic to discuss. Meanwhile, other things are drowned out, and partisanship builds rapidly between the two confronting sides.

Finally, the Social Construct is used with maximum force to press a social issue in the political front, and idols such as celebrities (with CEO-level incomes) and obviously commentators will take and define a position, and why it is preferable to the opposing viewpoint. Meanwhile, non-social issues go untouched by media, and it often takes a solution, tragedy, or another social issue to change the topic of focus to something different. Depending upon the success of the previous topic, it will be held as a trophy or covered up by the losing faction.


I present to you seven pieces of evidence caused by the corruption of the Social Construct in America. These symptoms apply to both major political parties, and are leading to skepticism among those who reject or criticize the Social Construct in America:

1. We have are so polarized that we will openly insult one another over which "side" we are.

2. We have been discussing what race Santa Clause is, and we are violently berating one another for it.
("Tip of the iceberg" example)

3. We applaud the destruction of character and personal attacks on those whom we disagree with.

4. Without thought, we decide that we share very little or nothing in common with those whom we oppose.

5. We will directly oppose a movement that our opponents support, as they are our enemy. We delegate that as our enemy, they shall not have this victory.

6. There is no "wholeness" as a nation; you deny the opposition, and neglect the fact of being American.

7. Objective and impartial judgement are out the door. People will refuse to consider how and why someone thinks differently, and will brand their process of thought as retardation, miseducation, and lunacy, regardless of whether or not the evidence at hand suggests otherwise.


Concluding; the social elite and the rich quite literally own the Social Construct. People will exhibit a collectivist opposition mentality at the behest of "Hollywood" and "Corporations." Entertainment and politics are infused together in a way that gives the Social Construct the authority to actually govern what we think, both about political issues, and of our fellow man.

As such, social engineering works the very same way that a lobbying firm works in Washington. The social media industry provides gratification for the populace thought entertainment and suspense, and through this gratification, it presses the viewer to accept what is presented. If they reject the entertainment, they shall not enjoy what they are seeing. If they accept what the industry provides, they receive gratification. I cite the "gratification" issue often highlighted among youth as an example, explained by how many of them are dependent upon the social media industry as their lone source of entertainment in modern America (Music, TV, Video-games, Facebook, Movies, etc.) and the dependency upon the gratification of social discourse and intercourse.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repressive_desublimation


My question is in regard to whether or not you see this. Do you feel as though the Social Construct has become a worrying force by combining the opiate of the entertainment industry with authoritarian delegation of what is and is not important?

Ads

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
03-24-2014, 10:31 AM
Post: #2
 
That is why people need to turn off their TVs and start doing their own thinking.

Ads

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
03-24-2014, 10:40 AM
Post: #3
 
Actually, it is the Der Angriff network that is brainwashing so many to blindly hate others and yes, they do have henchmen polluting social media outlets too.

Decades of brainwashing have brought us to the point where many will just call someone a name because they have no idea how to debate issues and because name calling runs rampant on their favorite Der Angriff network outlet, that is how they are taught to react..
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)