What about a tough kind of cricket with 22 players instead of 11 players in 50 overs in each side ?

[Maan J Bhatia]

What do you think will happen ? Do you think this format will be a success or failure ? Answer whatever you feel ? I am just asking for an opinion and want to hear your view of this scenario called "tough cricket" .DO NOT TAKE MY QUESTION SERIOUSLY !!! I know it's never going to happen like that.Just describe your opinion.



NOTE IDIOT & FACEBOOK PRIVACY INVADER FLAT TRACK BULLY NOT ALLOWED TO ANSWER

Word of caution for all yahoo users FLAT TRACK BULLY is a privacy invador of your facebook profiles and will post private details of yours if he disagrees with you.He is a sick guy and I am after him.What did you post about me FLAT TRACK BULLY in sachin kambli question ? I am after him and everyone please keep him off else your privacy is invaded too !!!

[FLAT TRACK BULLY]

Word of caution for all yahoo users FLAT TRACK BULLY is a privacy invador of your facebook profiles and will post private details of yours if he disagrees with you.He is a sick guy and I am after him.

[Green Top Bully]

Shahid Afridi will still tonk you Indians out of the park!

[Abhishek]

You asked one bully to not answer and first two answerers are bully..lol

Anyhow i think it will boring as it would be very hard for batsmen to score more or less runs will only be score of 6's and may bew few fours but bowlers will love that to happen.. The real question is for whom cricket is played..?? And the answer is audience and being an audience i wont like to see balls getting blocked again and again..

[Bill P]

It may never happen but it did in the early days. Games were often played with overs, 22 a side. Eleven versus 22. It wasn't uncommon for touring Elevens to play sides with more players.