Why did the "non-partisan" TeaPartyPatriots.net ban me from their Facebook page for pointing out...?

[Brett Favre †Give me Liberty or give me Death]

the statist policies of Mitt Romney, how he's not a true Tea Party guy, why I support Gary Johnson, and pointing out facts of the guy they seem to love, Abraham Lincoln.

Sounds like they don't like that whole free speech thing, or people having opposing viewpoints.
@ Bash- Yeah, the G0P is trying to take over the Tea Party. I support what the Tea Party stand for, but not what it's turning into.
EDIT: Sorry, it was TheTeaParty.net, not what I said before.
@ Weise- Not really all of it. There is the true Tea Party like Rand Paul, then there is the fake Tea Party like Paul Ryan.
@ Duran Duran- They praise Romney for one thing, I know Free Speech doesn't apply to private corporations, but I'd assume a group like that who claims to strive for basic rights would listen to opposing view points. Also, I did no ranting at all, I don't do that, I only said that I supported Gary Johnson, and that Romney was a big government guy, and that The Tea Party.net is just an establishment GOP organization, and they don't stick to the original grass-route ideas that the real Tea Party does.

All respectfully. They were less professional than I was when I was pointing out facts about Lincoln, they said that Liberals (implying I was one) have to do anything to make Republicans look bad, and dismissed everything I said with that statement. Then, after I called them GOP Establishment, they posted something pro-JFK pretending to be nonpartisan, but everyone there was confused, because I guess their website attracts establishment Republicans.
@ Weise- No, he's not. I personally don't agree with him on everything, but he is mostly Libertarian. Rand Paul is one of the few politicians I really like.

[george]

could be your confederate flag there

[realistic girl]

Sounds like something they would do.

[dstr]

There can be only ONE unanimous opinion under the BIG tent.

[BASH]

There's nothing non partisan about the tea party. The earlier tea party that began under Ron Paul was actually against spending and neocon policies. The far right wing took over the earlier tea party, ranting about taxes being too high under the lowest tax rate in 50 years. Now, they will turn around and vote for Romney to raise their taxes.

[Weise Ente]

I'm sure you are well aware the Tea Party is actually a far-right, social conservative, almost-fascist group these days, right?

Edit:
Rand Paul is a theocrat, not a libertarian.

[Duran Duran]

First of all, they are not non-partisan, but I don't want them to be anyway because we need all the help we can get to fight left-wing radical liberalism. Secondly, anyone with a brain knows that Romney is a Progressive and is not a Tea Party guy. Lastly, only the government is required to adhere to free speech. Companies and organizations are not required to give you free speech. Also, my guess is that you, rather than explaining your opinion of Romney in a sincere manner, you probably ranted and p*ssed people off who read it.

[Grizzly Man]

I got banned from Jr motorsports facebook for stating my views on clean coal, lol. Doesn't surprise me they banned you at all.