Would christians in america protect an atheist if an islamic group wanted to kill him for being an infidel?

[My Shepherd]

I'm getting a little scared of Islam . With the recent attacks in Libya and Egypt is showing Islamic unrest. this guy who had atheist stuff on his Facebook was placed in jail and the questionable Christian officer told the Muslims in the cell that he made fun of muhhamad . the atheist was beaten in jail.

would you as a christian (if islam took over the U.S.A.) throw us to the wolves or would you protect us?

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/20...geted.html

[Bomb Soldier]

YO F*CK ISLAM
BURN SHlT
KILL PEOPLE

[auskiwi101]

We don't need protecting

[westley]

I'd protect you. Actually we would most likely have to cooperate with each other since Muslims also think of Christians as Infidels.

[Chris]

I follow Jesus Christ. I would stand with you against oppression/fear/hatred. At least, I would like to think that I would. You can't really know until you're there...

Though I can't speak for others. There are people who call themselves christians who would do much the same in the name of Jesus. Fools all, in my opinion.

[DS M]

Only Muslim men have rights in Islam.

***An unaccompanied woman is ownerless. A foreign woman is outside the protection of the tribal system which uses family vendettas to settle disputes. It's no wonder that the already stratospheric sexual harassment rates in Cairo climb to a universal value where foreign women are concerned.

The Burka placed responsibility on women to defeminize themselves and mark themselves as property. Centuries of Islamic jurisprudence put the burden of responsibility for any assault on a woman as the object that tempts men to sin.

The circular reasoning of Islam says that if a man assaults a woman, it is because she tempted him. That femininity is inherently an object of temptation. The Burka and the Hijab began as a way of defeminizing women for their protection, but then became an indictment of women. Women were no longer being defeminized to protect them, but to protect men from them. Why else do women have to be defeminized, their faces masked and their voices silenced, if there isn't some terrible mysterious force about femininity that causes men to act out?

That is exactly what the first president of Iran claimed, when he said that, "Scientific research had shown that women's hair emitted rays that drove men insane." More recently an Iranian cleric explained that women who do not dress modestly corrupt men and cause earthquakes. The flight routes of Iranian planes had to be diverted from a stadium where women played soccer for fear that their hair rays might affect passengers in the planes above. Behind this hair ray nonsense lurks an uglier notion, that women are unnatural creatures and that men are not responsible for their conduct around women.

If a man rapes a woman, maybe her hair rays made him do it. If they can cause earthquakes, why not. Western legal culture says that men have more control over a situation with a woman. Islamic jurisprudence creates reasons why women do to exonerate their rapists. How do you sell the notion of equal rights to people who view women as dangerous objects that have to be kept under lock and key?

Under Islam a woman can't say 'no' except passively by defeminizing herself. By remaining in Purdah at home or taking a mobile purdah along by covering up her entire body and face in a Burka, never meeting a man's eye or speaking to him. And even if she follows all those rules and is still assaulted, then maybe those hair rays can punch through stifling black cloth after all. There's no way for a woman to be innocent, except by never being born.*** http://www.magyar-holland.com/index.php?...&Itemid=11

And when a Muslim father is so heartless as to rent out his 4th grade daughter to strange Muslim men for the weekend in his own home like a pimp in the west rents out a prostitute in a hotel, then you have an idea of the childhood of Muslim girls.

Of course, the difference between a western pimp and a Muslim father is the Muslim father can rent out his little girl with the approval of Sharia law, the (male) Muslim judge, the (male) Muslim neighbors, the (male) Muslim politicians, and the (male) Muslim clergy.

As this is what Muslim men do to female family members, I am baffled why you would limit the question to Christians...as if we held a higher place in a Muslim man's heart than his wife or daughter?

An infidel is an infidel. There is no distinct between the two like there is between the black eunuch ( parts are swept off by a single cut of a razor and serves as slaves in the harem) and the white eunuch (retains all the power of copulation and procreation without the wherewithal and serves as a slave in the government) http://www.allaboutturkey.com/harem.htm

I think the question could be asked to everyone who isn't a Muslim men who feel they should be masters of all women and infidels.

The question should be asked by women to Muslim women: ***would you as a woman throw us to the wolves or would you protect us?*** And I am sure she would answer, when were you there for me? It isn't as if they haven't asked.

"One Million Signatures Demanding Changes to Discriminatory Laws"
http://www.we-change.org/english/

Hope this helps