Hypothetically speaking how do you think Edge would be used if he ever went to to TNA & BQs?

[Joop]

BQ1: Do you think WWE would have been a lot better if Kane died and not Eddie Guerrero.
BQ2: Do you think William Regal should be the next WHC.
BQ3: Do you like midgets.
BQ4: Are you sick of hearing the word hash tag in WWE.
BQ5: Do you like this remix of AJ Styles theme.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7Zm_kryK...ture=g-upl

[FROSTYâ„¢]

Overall, I think in TNA he would be a midcarder. He was a midcarder at best in WWE too, until a "spark" was found in him that made him "overrated" as a wrestler, by thrusting him into the mainevent picture, and no, it didn't suit Edge at all.

In TNA, Edge would be pretty much like how WWE uses Christian, a top mid carder, with maybe a few titles. Edge doesn't have the touch or background of what it takes to be a maineventer there, its just not possible. Edge was more suited into WWE "TV-PG" than in TV-14 (fans can argue Edge was better at TV-14, but there is no doubt TV-PG had more influence)

He would be at best in the likes of Austin Aries, I'd like to see him compete for the X-Division. He could get over the crowd easily.

BQ1: Now I'm not saying anyone should die, but I really cannot say either would've been better. We might've lost tons of storylines if Kane died, same goes for Eddie, and we did lose Eddie, so either way, I don't think there is a "win-win" situation.

BQ2: Nah, he's fine where he is. WWE had damn enough time to make him the champion, he needs to get on with just training younger stars and commentating, he's got good wrestling skills, it will be valuable for the young stars.

BQ3: Well, no use in disliking someone for their height, so I guess its a yes.

BQ4: I'm sick of anything in WWE to do with Twitter itself, let alone hashtag. Sometimes I wonder what WWE is really forcing down our throats: Cena or Twitter? I'd say Twitter.

BQ5: Pretty neat.