This Forum has been archived there is no more new posts or threads ... use this link to report any abusive content
==> Report abusive content in this page <==
Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why do you have to consider Cultural Issues in Textiles?
11-18-2012, 01:00 PM
Post: #1
Why do you have to consider Cultural Issues in Textiles?
This is part of a GCSE piece, We have to write paragraphs about Social, Moral, Ethical, Cultural and Safety Issues, and I have no idea on what to write in the Cultural part! Please help! Thanks.

Ads

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-18-2012, 01:08 PM
Post: #2
 
An example that affects almost everything on your list is the emergance of industrial capitalism. The industrial revolution in the UK meant that alot of Cities (Manchester for example) started processing textiles. They got the raw material from India now instead of wool from farms in the UK....they needed more because they now had machinery and factories and lots f people in Cities..They could now produce more and make more money...India was displaced as the premier supplier of cotton goods. ...

Here are some sources; wiki has lots of info on this too...


Protestant work ethic
Main article: Protestant work ethic

Another theory is that the British advance was due to the presence of an entrepreneurial class which believed in progress, technology and hard work.[88] The existence of this class is often linked to the Protestant work ethic (see Max Weber) and the particular status of the Baptists and the dissenting Protestant sects, such as the Quakers and Presbyterians that had flourished with the English Civil War. Reinforcement of confidence in the rule of law, which followed establishment of the prototype of constitutional monarchy in Britain in the Glorious Revolution of 1688, and the emergence of a stable financial market there based on the management of the national debt by the Bank of England, contributed to the capacity for, and interest in, private financial investment in industrial ventures.

Dissenters found themselves barred or discouraged from almost all public offices, as well as education at England's only two universities at the time (although dissenters were still free to study at Scotland's four universities). When the restoration of the monarchy took place and membership in the official Anglican Church became mandatory due to the Test Act, they thereupon became active in banking, manufacturing and education. The Unitarians, in particular, were very involved in education, by running Dissenting Academies, where, in contrast to the universities of Oxford and Cambridge and schools such as Eton and Harrow, much attention was given to mathematics and the sciences—areas of scholarship vital to the development of manufacturing technologies.

Historians sometimes consider this social factor to be extremely important, along with the nature of the national economies involved. While members of these sects were excluded from certain circles of the government, they were considered fellow Protestants, to a limited extent, by many in the middle class, such as traditional financiers or other businessmen. Given this relative tolerance and the supply of capital, the natural outlet for the more enterprising members of these sects would be to seek new opportunities in the technologies created in the wake of the scientific revolution of the 17th century.

This theory does not explain how the second country to be industrialised-Belgium, was Catholic.
'Other effects

The application of steam power to the industrial processes of printing supported a massive expansion of newspaper and popular book publishing, which reinforced rising literacy and demands for mass political participation.

During the Industrial Revolution, the life expectancy of children increased dramatically. The percentage of the children born in London who died before the age of five decreased from 74.5% in 1730–1749 to 31.8% in 1810–1829.[26]

The growth of modern industry from the late 18th century onward led to massive urbanisation and the rise of new great cities, first in Europe and then in other regions, as new opportunities brought huge numbers of migrants from rural communities into urban areas. In 1800, only 3% of the world's population lived in cities,[45] a figure that has risen to nearly 50% at the beginning of the 21st century.[46] In 1717 Manchester was merely a market town of 10,000 people, but by 1911 it had a population of 2.3 million.[47]

The greatest killer in the cities was tuberculosis (TB).[48] According to the Harvard University Library, "By the late 19th century, 70 to 90% of the urban populations of Europe and North America were infected with the TB bacillus, and about 80% of those individuals who developed active tuberculosis died of it. About 40% of working-class deaths in cities were from tuberculosis."[49]

Ads

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)