This Forum has been archived there is no more new posts or threads ... use this link to report any abusive content
==> Report abusive content in this page <==
Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why is it good to buy housing on the free market? why not supply it as a right and remove 35% of the costs?
11-19-2012, 02:07 AM
Post: #1
Why is it good to buy housing on the free market? why not supply it as a right and remove 35% of the costs?
you know- interest, finance charges, service charges- all that is 35%-50% of the costs-
whats wrong with cutting out the charges through public housing?

Would that make Social Security go farther?

Ads

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-19-2012, 02:15 AM
Post: #2
 
Have you ever been to a public housing project?

So, to get this right, you want to the individual to not have to pay for their home, but have the government provide it for them?

Even if you did that, I do not see what that would have to do with the SS program.

Ads

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-19-2012, 02:15 AM
Post: #3
 
it worked SO well for the communists.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-19-2012, 02:15 AM
Post: #4
 
Because it doesn't work that way and never will here in the United States. Free market society and all that.. Try England where you pay rent to the local housing councils.

Oh wait...you don't want to pay anything.....

NOT happening.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-19-2012, 02:15 AM
Post: #5
 
Show me which large government program is less expensive and we'll talk.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-19-2012, 02:15 AM
Post: #6
 
The whole dating things sucks too.. let's just have the government assign us our mates. Also, it took me a few seconds to decide what shirt to wear this morning... can't the government dictate that for us? It would be a lot more efficient.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-19-2012, 02:15 AM
Post: #7
 
If it's supplied by the government, it ceases to be a right, and becomes an entitlement. We have the right to own property, but that doesn't mean that anyone is obligated to provide it for us.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-19-2012, 02:15 AM
Post: #8
 
You have never talked to a landlord, have you?

Without an ownership, there is little incentive for upkeep. Look at subsidized housing, no matter how nice it starts, it winds up a dumpy slum.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-19-2012, 02:15 AM
Post: #9
 
If you want to live in the housing projects, go right ahead. But why try to drag others down to your low standards?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-19-2012, 02:15 AM
Post: #10
 
You are right. Today the government could cheaply buy millions of vacant homes using emergency powers and eminent domain, and assign people to live in them based on need, they could even charge small rents just to cover maintenance and upkeep, but we're talking $200 a month, not the outrageous rents the free market wants to go into the bank accounts of people who are already wealthy.
There is a tremendous demand for public housing and no they are not all that bad. The free market does not want more built, they don't want the competition, they want people forced to just pay their rents.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)