This Forum has been archived there is no more new posts or threads ... use this link to report any abusive content
==> Report abusive content in this page <==
Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What's the difference between neoliberalism and liberalism, neorealism and realism?
11-19-2012, 02:11 AM
Post: #1
What's the difference between neoliberalism and liberalism, neorealism and realism?
And what does neo-neo debate mean roughly? Thanks for any help.

Ads

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-19-2012, 02:19 AM
Post: #2
 
Neo liberalism is a process, what most of the world calls globalization.

Liberalism is a political ideology.

I have never heard of neo-realism, but realists are in opposition to neocons.

Neo-liberalism is a set of economic policies that have become widespread during the last 25 years or so. Although the word is rarely heard in the United States, you can clearly see the effects of neo-liberalism here as the rich grow richer and the poor grow poorer.

"Liberalism" can refer to political, economic, or even religious ideas. In the U.S. political liberalism has been a strategy to prevent social conflict. It is presented to poor and working people as progressive compared to conservative or Rightwing. Economic liberalism is different. Conservative politicians who say they hate "liberals" -- meaning the political type -- have no real problem with economic liberalism, including neoliberalism.

"Neo" means we are talking about a new kind of liberalism. So what was the old kind? The liberal school of economics became famous in Europe when Adam Smith, an Scottish economist, published a book in 1776 called THE WEALTH OF NATIONS. He and others advocated the abolition of government intervention in economic matters. No restrictions on manufacturing, no barriers to commerce, no tariffs, he said; free trade was the best way for a nation's economy to develop. Such ideas were "liberal" in the sense of no controls. This application of individualism encouraged "free" enterprise," "free" competition -- which came to mean, free for the capitalists to make huge profits as they wished.

The main points of neo-liberalism include:

THE RULE OF THE MARKET. Liberating "free" enterprise or private enterprise from any bonds imposed by the government (the state) no matter how much social damage this causes. Greater openness to international trade and investment, as in NAFTA. Reduce wages by de-unionizing workers and eliminating workers' rights that had been won over many years of struggle. No more price controls. All in all, total freedom of movement for capital, goods and services. To convince us this is good for us, they say "an unregulated market is the best way to increase economic growth, which will ultimately benefit everyone." It's like Reagan's "supply-side" and "trickle-down" economics -- but somehow the wealth didn't trickle down very much.

CUTTING PUBLIC EXPENDITURE FOR SOCIAL SERVICES like education and health care. REDUCING THE SAFETY-NET FOR THE POOR, and even maintenance of roads, bridges, water supply -- again in the name of reducing government's role. Of course, they don't oppose government subsidies and tax benefits for business.

DEREGULATION. Reduce government regulation of everything that could diminsh profits, including protecting the environmentand safety on the job.

PRIVATIZATION. Sell state-owned enterprises, goods and services to private investors. This includes banks, key industries, railroads, toll highways, electricity, schools, hospitals and even fresh water. Although usually done in the name of greater efficiency, which is often needed, privatization has mainly had the effect of concentrating wealth even more in a few hands and making the public pay even more for its needs.

ELIMINATING THE CONCEPT OF "THE PUBLIC GOOD" or "COMMUNITY" and replacing it with "individual responsibility." Pressuring the poorest people in a society to find solutions to their lack of health care, education and social security all by themselves -- then blaming them, if they fail, as "lazy."

Ads

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-19-2012, 02:19 AM
Post: #3
 
There is nothing "real" if you are liberal except your own dimentia.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-19-2012, 02:19 AM
Post: #4
 
Never use "liberalism" and "realism" in the same sentence.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-19-2012, 02:19 AM
Post: #5
 
there are no neo-liberalism because the Jews had already hijacked the Democratic Party a long time ago
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-19-2012, 02:19 AM
Post: #6
 
Its socialism pure and simple, no matter what name they hide under.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-19-2012, 02:19 AM
Post: #7
 
Neo simply means 'new'.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-19-2012, 02:19 AM
Post: #8
 
Neo-realism was an Italian film movement in the aftermath of WW2 as the only films they could make where very realistic dramas with no budget. In the political sense I have no idea.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-19-2012, 02:19 AM
Post: #9
 
Neo liberalism was an idea created from those unhappy with embedded liberalism
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)