How many times did the ex-SEALs at the CIA Annex in Benghazi ask to assist the US Consulate and were denied?

[Jack B. Nimble]

See that's why we need to vote and get Obama out of office. He's ruining this country with debt and letting our diplomats die because of his sympathy for Muslims.

[Elmer]

I will explain.

Before, during, after - the only way to interpret Obama's actions related to the Benghazi attack is...?

BEFORE: OBAMA REFUSED TO STRENGTHEN SECURITY

Obama refused requests to strengthen security in Benghazi to prevent an attack.

DURING: OBAMA REFUSED TO MAKE ANY MILITARY RESPONSE

Officials were watching the attack in real time from a drone that was over Benghazi, but Obama refused to make any military response so the attack continued for nearly 7 hours.

AFTER: OBAMA REPEATED TERRORIST PROPAGANDA

For 2 weeks after the attack, Obama blamed the attack on a video, which was the propaganda the terrorists were using to justify their attack. We now know that Obama knew this was a lie, but he continued to say it.

FARTHER AFTER: OBAMA LIES TO DENY HIS LIES

Now Obama and his stooges are denying that Obama blamed the attack on a video, and they claim he was calling it a terrorist attack by clinging to the word "terror" that he said ONCE in his Rose Garden speech, even though he did not clearly connect this word to the Benghazi attack specifically.


HOW CAN WE INTERPRET THIS ANY WAY OTHER THAN:

Obama WANTED this attack.

He did NOTHING to prevent it.

He did NOTHING to intervene in it.

He did NOTHING to tell us the truth about it.

Now that he's been caught lying, he tries to LIE HIS WAY OUT OF IT.

OBAMA IS ONE OF THE TERRORISTS

THE PRESIDENT IS A TERRORIST

How can we logically reach any other conclusion?

[gatita]

I think it is important to know, the former head of a Special Forces "Site Security Team" in Libya tells CBS News that in spite of multiple pleas from himself and other U.S. security officials on the ground for "more, not less" security personnel, the State Department removed as many as 34 people from the country in the six months before a terrorist attack in Benghazi that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others.

The first email, timed at 4:05 p.m. Washington time - or 10:05 p.m. Benghazi time, 20-30 minutes after the attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission allegedly began - carried the subject line "U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi Under Attack" and the notation "SBU", meaning "Sensitive But Unclassified."The records obtained by Reuters consist of three emails dispatched by the State Department's The text said the State Department's regional security office had reported that the diplomatic mission in Benghazi was "under attack. Embassy in Tripoli reports approximately 20 armed people fired shots; explosions have been heard as well." The message continued: "Ambassador Stevens, who is currently in Benghazi, and four ... personnel are in the compound safe haven. The 17th of February militia is providing security support."

A third email, also marked SBU and sent at 6:07 p.m. Washington time, carried the subject line: "Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack." The message reported: "Embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripoli." While some information identifying recipients of this message was redacted from copies of the messages obtained by Reuters.

How can Obama and his minions claim ignorance of the situation is beyond imagination. Isn't it obvious the denials were to deflect criticism in order to be reelected.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57…
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/…
http://politics.gather.com/viewArticle.a…
http://news.yahoo.com/white-house-told-m…
http://www.guelphmercury.com/.../814684-…
http://news.yahoo.com/video/accusations-…

gatita

Degree in History (focus Jewish studies) and Spanish, New Mexico State U. 1990