This Forum has been archived there is no more new posts or threads ... use this link to report any abusive content
==> Report abusive content in this page <==
Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
When will Obama accept that he failed to provide more security for our ambassador to Libya?
11-27-2012, 06:38 AM
Post: #1
When will Obama accept that he failed to provide more security for our ambassador to Libya?

Ads

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 06:46 AM
Post: #2
 
When will Republicans take responsibility at cutting the security budget by $300 million?

Ads

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 06:46 AM
Post: #3
 
At his trial.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 06:46 AM
Post: #4
 
Give it a rest already. Your hero Bush murdered one million Iraqis and 4000 American soldiers. There were TWELVE ATTACKS against diplomats under Dumbyas watch. You trying to use this against Obama proves what kind of morons you cons are, just like you were ten years ago.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 06:46 AM
Post: #5
 
When will your father accept he failed to bring protection to your mommas bedroom?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 06:46 AM
Post: #6
 
After the election.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 06:46 AM
Post: #7
 
No. The unbiased and impartial press has given Obama a pass on this. Which is why many were surprised that Romney did not make such as issue at the last debate. Facts are pretty much meaningless if the press considers otherwise.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 06:46 AM
Post: #8
 
Who cut the budget by 300 million? If Romney gets in who will you blame when he and his henchman take Medicare, Social Security, etc and put them in the hands of big business, cut all the social programs to keep the tax breaks for big business and the rich.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 06:46 AM
Post: #9
 
It's not his responsiblity, and if you'd read the memos as I did they were a calm assesement of a situtation, not some immediate plea for help with the terrorists at the gates.
Until I read them I though it was a much stronger situation, it wasn't.
It was rather routine, they spoke of the Libyans not providing a competent security.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 06:46 AM
Post: #10
 
I wish people would examine the evidence before making accusations or slanderous answers which benefit no one. These answers are similar to people before the 2008 election. It is amazing how many who were asked the same questions displayed ignorance of our government and responses to quotes.

Idiots who voted for Obama
http://youtu.be/e_JJLLfTR8I

A top State Department security official in Libya told a congressional investigator that he had argued unsuccessfully for more security in the weeks before Ambassador Chris Stevens was killed. Department officials instead wanted to “normalize operations and reduce security resources,” he wrote in an email Tuesday. Senior State Department officials acknowledged to Congress on Wednesday that they had turned down requests to send more U.S. military personnel to guard diplomatic facilities in Libya shortly before the Sept. 11 attack that killed the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans. But Charlene Lamb, deputy assistant secretary in charge of diplomatic security, argued that security at the U.S. mission in Benghazi was appropriate for known threats related to the 11th anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the United States.

The records obtained by Reuters consist of three emails dispatched by the State Department's The text said the State Department's regional security office had reported that the diplomatic mission in Benghazi was "under attack.

A second email, headed "Update 1: U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi" and timed 4:54 p.m. Washington time, said that the Embassy in Tripoli had reported that "the firing at the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi had stopped and the compound had been cleared." It said a "response team" was at the site attempting to locate missing personnel.

A third email, also marked SBU and sent at 6:07 p.m. Washington time, carried the subject line: "Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack." The message reported: "Embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripoli."

Every email was ignored and as a result Ambassador Stevens was brutally killed as well as the 4 men assigned to protect him and the embassy. Then Obama described the incident as a "small bump". He clearly is not fit to hold the office of president of the US!

gatita

Degree in History (focus Jewish studies) and Spanish, New Mexico State U. 1990
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)