What was the official 911 commission report findings on the twin tower collapses &why no test for explosives?

[Get a Job con]

plane fly me see on tv

Bush say bin laden and iraq bad

[mr danger]

Would you care to stand up and explain to the class exactly how 50,000 street savvy New Yorkers + an unknown amount of tourists, + an unknown amount of union tradesmen + an unknown amount of cops & firemen simply overlooked the fact their buildings were being wired for explosives,?
This could be interesting
As far as your aircraft references go :
First all your airspeed numbers are all wrong
In that airspace below 10,000' there is a strictly enforced do not exceed speed of 200kts
I think that your aircraft types are wrong to
Realistically the towers were probably designed to withstand the impact of a slow moving DC-10 on final into LGA .
Update
And so it came to pass that the bad guys that wired the Twin Towers for explosives really did have a soft spot because the North Tower collapsed
102 minutes after it was hit and the South Tower collapsed 56 minutes after it was hit thus giving those who were in the building -including 6 friends of mine to get out alive ( 4 of my friends weren't so lucky )
Truthers : What's wrong that picture ?
@ Silver Bob
In the course of your engineering studies , what did you learn about how skyscrapers w/o an internal steel skeleton behave when the horizontal members that connect the big box on the outside to the little box on the inside are compromised ?

[teeny-tiny876]

If the heat from the fires had brought down the twin towers, then it should have buckled and twisted, over a few minutes at least, before suffering catastrophic collapse.

HOWEVER

What everyone saw was the twin towers go from standing up straight to IMMEDIATE catastrophic collapse - EXACTLY like a controlled demolition. The list of inconsistencies, omissions and logical fallacies in the government's explanation goes on and on and on and...


I spent 9 years at university studying chemistry and engineering. Everything in the official "findings" goes against everything I learned at university. They are ONLY officials. Just as Mubarak has officials. Just as Ben Ali has officials. Just as Gaddafi has his officials. Just as China has officials. They are just flesh and blood the same as everyone else - some of them lie and some of them don't.

I hope the so called "experts" writing for "Popular Mechanics" can sleep easily at night after the pack of lies they put in their little magazine. "Popular Mechanics" hardly counts as a serious publication in the field of engineering. Did the so called "experts" write it or did someone in the CIA write it for them?

The buildings had a factor of safety of 30 - meaning they were 30 times stronger than they needed to be. Most skyscrapers are pretty damned strong otherwise nobody would use them and the insurance would be astronomical.


@ snoobling

Oh WOW, you're a "genius"?? Have you got a degree in that??? I watched some of the videos you highlighted. They all seemed a bit patronising and far fetched. The standard of science in them was pretty poor too. I'm sure they all might seem very convincing to someone who's never studied this stuff before BUT I've studied this stuff for 9 years and it takes more than some fake science and far fetched "logic" to fool me.

You might care to explain why soo many 9/11 witnesses keep having bizarre accidents and winding up dead?? And while you're at it you can tell me what happened to the gold under the twin towers? You know, the vaults that millions of new Yorkers never get to see? Or why the steel was melted when the fires don't even get hot enough to melt it? Or were the rescue workers lying?? Has the janitor been murdered yet?? He seemed to have plenty to say on the matter.

Oh and don't forget to explain what happened to the $2.3 TRILLION that the pentagon "lost" or the $1.5 TRILLION in counterfeit bonds that Cantor Fitzgerald created or how the markets knew in advance that something was going to happen on 9/11?

Yeah, sure you can find some video debunking the 9/11 truthers - that's what the CIA does. You give them TRILLIONS of Dollars to find out everything about everything and somehow 9/11 took them all completely by "surprise" - you don't say?!?

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/governm...cial-media
"The U.S. government long ago announced its intention to "fight the net"."

"In the continuing saga of data security firm HBGary, a new caveat has come to light: not only did they plot to help destroy secrets outlet WikiLeaks and discredit progressive bloggers, they also crafted detailed proposals for software that manages online "personas," allowing a single human to assume the identities of as many fake people as they'd like."

[Sixfeettall]

The 911 Commission report did not analyze the twin tower collapses, nor was that its purpose, so it had no "findings".

I love the way you put the "multiple jet liners" twist on the impact study.

[Sixfeettall]

I reckon the explosives must have been pre-built into the fabric of the building because they planned to make an insurance claim all along, as you couldn't wire the whole building whilst it was being used, so if it needed to come down as they eventually do, it would have been very time consuming to set this up.
And they probably had evidence to get rid of and other stuff to sneak out of the volts in the basement.

I certainly don't buy that thing about finding a paper ID belonging to a terrorist the whole thing was a fireball of disintigrating concrete and melting steel too.