This Forum has been archived there is no more new posts or threads ... use this link to report any abusive content
==> Report abusive content in this page <==
Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
0bama skips work (intel meetings), ignores Libya to go to a Jay Z party, & plays with Big Bird - fit for job?
11-27-2012, 07:00 AM
Post: #1
0bama skips work (intel meetings), ignores Libya to go to a Jay Z party, & plays with Big Bird - fit for job?

Ads

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 07:08 AM
Post: #2
 
Nope.

Ads

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 07:08 AM
Post: #3
 
Neither of them are fit for the job.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 07:08 AM
Post: #4
 
At least he is better by far than the alternative, and at least he is human and likes to have fun. Intelligence breifings are part of his job. Stop second guessing him, he needs our support.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 07:08 AM
Post: #5
 
Bushney allowed 9-11 on their watch. Ignored the suffering of millions of US citizens during Katrina for days until some federal action was taken. Far worse crimes and he was re-elected.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 07:08 AM
Post: #6
 
Sounds like he is reverting back to a more child like personality. I think it is caused by him hiding his homosexuality for so long
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 07:08 AM
Post: #7
 
he play with the big birds
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 07:08 AM
Post: #8
 
Make up some more stuff. You are a master at that.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 07:08 AM
Post: #9
 
Nobody claims obama is a hard worker. He just likes the perks.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 07:08 AM
Post: #10
 
Absolutely NOT!!! How could he not know? One of the men who was in charge of security for U.S. diplomats in Libya says he feared for their safety long before the attack last month on the consulate in Benghazi. Four Americans were killed in the attacks on the Libyan consulate, including Ambassador Chris Stevens. security team leader in Libya: "We needed more, not less" security staff. Wood first set foot in Libya last February to lead an elite, 16-man counterterrorism team. From the moment he arrived, he says he saw chaos. "Shooting instances occurred, many instances involved the local security guard force that we were training," he told CBS News. "Constantly, there were battles going on between militias, criminal activity and that became increasing danger as time went on as well."

A top State Department security official in Libya told a congressional investigator that he had argued unsuccessfully for more security in the weeks before Ambassador Chris Stevens was killed. Department officials instead wanted to “normalize operations and reduce security resources,” Senior State Department officials acknowledged to Congress on Wednesday that they had turned down requests to send more U.S. military personnel to guard diplomatic facilities in Libya shortly before the Sept. 11 attack that killed the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans. But Charlene Lamb, deputy assistant secretary in charge of diplomatic security, argued that security at the U.S. mission in Benghazi was appropriate for known threats related to the 11th anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the United States.

The first email, timed at 4:05 p.m. Washington time - or 10:05 p.m. Benghazi time, 20-30 minutes after the attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission allegedly began - carried the subject line "U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi Under Attack" and the notation "SBU", meaning "Sensitive But Unclassified."The records obtained by Reuters consist of three emails dispatched by the State Department's The text said the State Department's regional security office had reported that the diplomatic mission in Benghazi was "under attack. Embassy in Tripoli reports approximately 20 armed people fired shots; explosions have been heard as well." The message continued: "Ambassador Stevens, who is currently in Benghazi, and four ... personnel are in the compound safe haven. The 17th of February militia is providing security support."

A third email, also marked SBU and sent at 6:07 p.m. Washington time, carried the subject line: "Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack." The message reported: "Embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripoli." While some information identifying recipients of this message was redacted from copies of the messages obtained by Reuters.

How can Obama and his minions claim ignorance of the situation is beyond imagination. Isn't it obvious the denials were to deflect criticism in order to be reelected.

gatita

Degree in History (focus Jewish studies) and Spanish, New Mexico State U. 1990
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)