Have you seen this Video about Libya and the Obama Administration?

[Bronson]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znVqyfxfbRQ

When I saw it I thought it was pretty damming for the Obama administration, but I am just curious to see if it has become popular or not.
Clarity: you understand that this proves that the whole Obama Administration was misleading the American people and the United Nations about the events on September 11.

[clarity]

It's popular only among people who weren't going to vote for Obama anyway. Obama has had so many vicious rumors and downright lies circulating about him this is just one more.

How the hell would ANY of you have the inside track to this information? I understand it was a movie. That's what I understand. You should do a little more research on Romney. I FULLY support your right to support him. I am also entitled to my opinion. I did not get personal with anyone who posted here. Your intolerance of anyone believing anything different than you do is one reason I could NEVER support the Republican party as it now stands.

[JO MAMA!]

Clarity you need clarity. It's not a lie. You are!

[Ollicopter]

Well so far there are two other responses. One says its all lies. The other declares the first is the lie. The video which is what the question was about shows the Obama Administraion or its surogate claiming adamantly that the 911 incident was in response to a video. People on the ground said there was no ongoing protest when the attack occured. A time line of the attack definately shows not only was the attack planned in advance to occur on the 911 aniversary but also responses to the attack were expected accurately and planned for as well. The video shows a train of liars repeatedly claiming the attack was in response to the video when there was no protest precede the attack in which participants intentionally as planned showe up with tactical weapons. The continuous lie repeated for weeks was a cover up and no U S citizen should be supporting a pack of liars.

[justgetitright]

Clarity is a fool, completely sucked in by what Obama said that he said. In his Rose Garden speech
Obama never used the word Terrorist Attack or Terrorism.

The word that he did say was "No acts of terror", however this was NOT related to the attack of the Embassy in Benghazi it was part of his response as he mentioned the WTC incident of 9/11/01

"Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks. We mourned with the families who were lost on that day. I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed. And then last night, we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.

As Americans, let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases, lay down their lives for it. Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those both civilian and military who represent us around the globe.

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.

The he says "Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done."

Not ACT of TERROR but TERRIBLE ACT

Prior to these portions of the speech, Obama was giving an indication that the attack was related to the anti-Muslim film.

"Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None. The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts."

Notice that even here he does not call it a terrorist attack but a brutal attack.

[gatita]

Even though many are not Christians this scripture explains not only Obama's lies but those who choose the lie over the truth. John 8:44 - Ye are of [your] father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. It is reminiscent of those about bin-Laden. In response to the claims of Obama ordering the death of bin-Laden they are false!! According to a White House insider, President Obama didn't order the attack that resulted in a bin Laden death. Leon Panetta, former head of the CIA, overruled Obama's "persistent hesitation to act." And yet Obama took the credit as usual. I have not seen this video but many others of the lies that were fed to the American people.

A top State Department security official in Libya told a congressional investigator that he had argued unsuccessfully for more security in the weeks before Ambassador Chris Stevens was killed. Department officials instead wanted to “normalize operations and reduce security resources,” he wrote in an email Tuesday. Senior State Department officials acknowledged to Congress on Wednesday that they had turned down requests to send more U.S. military personnel to guard diplomatic facilities in Libya shortly before the Sept. 11 attack that killed the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans. But Charlene Lamb, deputy assistant secretary in charge of diplomatic security, argued that security at the U.S. mission in Benghazi was appropriate for known threats related to the 11th anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the United States.

The records obtained by Reuters consist of three emails dispatched by the State Department's The text said the State Department's regional security office had reported that the diplomatic mission in Benghazi was "under attack.

A second email, headed "Update 1: U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi" and timed 4:54 p.m. Washington time, said that the Embassy in Tripoli had reported that "the firing at the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi had stopped and the compound had been cleared." It said a "response team" was at the site attempting to locate missing personnel.

A third email, also marked SBU and sent at 6:07 p.m. Washington time, carried the subject line: "Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack." The message reported: "Embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripoli."

Every email was ignored and as a result Ambassador Stevens was brutally killed as well as the 4 men assigned to protect him and the embassy. Then Obama described the incident as a "small bump". He clearly is not fit to hold the office of president of the US!

gatita
Degree in History (focus Jewish studies) and Spanish, New Mexico State U. 1990