MEN SHOULD BE MORE HIGHLY APPRECIATED BC DEY HAVE GREAT CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT THAN WOMEN DO?

[Lai Oanh]

So sorry that my question is not clear (due to the limited letters)
ANYWAY, DO YOU HAVE ANY PRO AND CON IDEA FOR THIS TOPIC?
I feel like SOME people here are quiet annoying and impolite.
There is not enough room to type the whole topic which is "MEN SHOULD BE MORE HIGHLY APPRECIATED BECAUSE THEY HAVE GREAT CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT THAN WOMEN DO" along with my question, even though I tried to shorten it. But I decided to let it as it is because I don't want to make it difficult to read. That's why I made a question in the following space, of course I know there is an additional box for detailing.
Finally, this is a topic for debating, I'm not making it about myself. Ohhh people...

[Cats]

uhh

[Peanut Butter]

When men rape, that is not considered a "great contribution" to social development.

[halorays]

You know you can continue clarifying your question in the space below, right?
I think the statement above is bullscheize. Why should society elevate men even higher because of individual mens accomplishments in life? no.

[se tt]

Or should be deminished because they have created most of the wars and are in the most prisons and have the most trouble coming up with money for their own children...?

[Athena]

Limited letters?
I can use all 26 and you are saying you have contributed more than a woman?

Considering it was a woman who invented the idea of computer programing,
I might re-asses my standing if I were you.

Or at least learn to use the other letters of the alphabet.

[O]

Yes. Anti-war activists, philanthropists, greatest thinkers, police officers, fire fighters, modern health, facebook, twitter, the internet, medicine and health, technology, education, etc.
Men have done too much for this world, people forget all this when they mention rapists and murderes, an ungrateful world we live in.

[Avalon]

I'll appreciate the actual individuals who contributed, not the entire mass of the male gender. The majority of men had/have absolutely nothing to do with contributing something positive to "social development." Why should I give them credit when they deserve none? How absurd.

[Keyring]

Well, when those men make those social developments, then those particular men can be appreciated. I see no reason to appreciate other men who have nothing to do with said developments.