Does anyone want the Rams to move back to Los Angeles?

[Teresa G]

Just asking because everyone on the Facebook page is like ''bring the Rams back where they belong'' and everything but i don't think the Rams are going to be a Super Bowl team just because they moved to LA.

[Dave87gn]

No, they should stay
the Jaguars will move to LA

[Jason B.]

No. I think a city which would make a good market, yet has never had an NFL franchise, would be a better place for a moving team (not just the Rams, as I do not believe they will move.) LA has proved that it is not a good market for the NFL over the years and should not be given a fourth chance over cities that have not been given a first.

[Live to Fish]

Maybe the Lions would do better in LA than in Det-Rot.

[Mr R]

I don't think they are one of the teams that are being considered to move there.
You are right, they are pretty bad right now, no matter where they play.

[Jerry]

that would help them,,i hope they move back

[Mel Kiper Jr.]

LA doesnt deserve a 4th chance with a NFL team. YES 4th. They had the Chargers prior to them moving to San Diego. They had the Rams and Raiders. All 3 teams moved away from the LA area. Just becuase they built a new stadium doesnt mean people will go to games. The lack of Fan support is why the teams moved in the first place. This jags are in a big area in jacksonville yet they lack fan support. Their games always get blackouted and they never sell out. Yet when the Florida VS Georgia game is there the game sells out and a few hundred thousand people are out tailgating and enjoying the festivites going on. Some places just arent right for the NFL. Being a big market is the only thing to look at. Green Bay isnt a large market in the slightest yet they sell out on a regular basis and the season ticket waiting list is extremley long.

[coolsuavekid]

No, I think that the Rams should stay in St. Louis, but I do know for a fact that LA is in the courting the Chargers, Jaguars, and Bills to possibly relocate. But I also know that the NFL is looking to grant two new franchises, LA is one that has been on the minds of owners and the League offices of possibly placing two in the city, also strange as it may be, Las Vegas, Oklahoma City and maybe a second team for the second city Chicago have been of interest.

[Jro1980]

Most likely Jacksonville is the probable team to relocate to L.A. if it is to ever happen (which I wouldn't for several years). The Buffalo Bills have talked of moving but north to Toronto, Canada which I think would be an ingenious move considering every other major American sport has a franchise there (Blue Jays, Raptors, Maple Leafs, sorry I don't count soccer).
St. Louis has had several consecutive down years is all, when they were good during the Warner era they had lots of fans.
The Lions have played in Detroit since the dawn of time. Plus like the Saints a few years ago the blue and silver are in a downtrodden city and the organization would get too much negative feedback if they were to move.
Perhaps in expansion they'll get one if that ever happens again. I think they're deserving of a team just not TWO teams. That's what drowned them. The Rams and Raiders left the same year and the league should have allowed only one of them to go initially.
I've honestly never understood how the Clippers have survived there for so many decades of mediocrity in the Lakers shadow.

[voicelessdress297]

Los Angeles has already proven multiple times that a NFL team be sustained there. There is all this hype about someone moving to LA and it's like everyone forgot that LA used to have multiple football teams throughout the years!! What happened to them?? I for one, don't think California needs another football team and would be disappointed to see any team wind up going. For the Jags, it does seem inevitable, but I don't think the Rams will be moving back. Especially once they are under new ownership.