Questionnaire on Phillip Schofield List Scandal and The Importance of Research?

[River Albion]

Questionnaire

Are you aware of the blunder Phillip Schofield committed on television in relation to child sex allegations against Conservative politicians?

What do you think led Schofield into making such a ‘rookie’ mistake? E.g. the internet?

Do you think Schofield received the right sanctions from ITV, or do you believe he has been ‘let off the hook’ too easily?

Do you think he is solely to blame?

Do you think the internet has ensured the information we access is mainly secondary/untruthful? (Wiki, yahoo answers etc.)

When you research, do you primarily use secondary research/research taken from the internet?

Do you triangulate your research?

What are your views on Wikipedia?

Do you believe that the widespread use of social media influences our opinion on popular news stories?

Do things you see on social networking sites influence your opinion? If so, why?

Do you think things seen on the sites (Posted mainly by celebrities or those with a following) are taken too seriously? If so, why?

Are you more likely to believe a story printed in the newspaper, or a story seen on the internet?

[Intellectualearthquake626]

I think my views on this whole distressing matter are well known to members.At the height of the hysteria there were death threats and peado smears made against this member.
If you bother to read the sometimes astonishing claims made by some of the famed figures of the past (even Churchill) former prime ministers etc by people such as Icke (look at his site) you are left with a surety its not right.Sometimes one own senses can detect whats not right.
It was from them that the idiot Schofield took his list.
I dont take anything seriously.Things are made up.Newspapers make things up.

[dick.thepenman]

Schofield is a childrens entertainer and not a very good one,that is all you need to know