This Forum has been archived there is no more new posts or threads ... use this link to report any abusive content
==> Report abusive content in this page <==
Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What are all the toes of anarchism?
04-28-2013, 12:48 PM
Post: #1
What are all the toes of anarchism?
Ok well ik nt an anarchist I just truly want to know.what are all the types and what do yet all mean?and why would anarchy work and won't it?thnx guys

Ads

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-28-2013, 12:50 PM
Post: #2
 
I guess your opinion on whether anarchy would work or not can be viewed as a derivation of your opinion on human nature.

Ads

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-28-2013, 12:58 PM
Post: #3
 
Uh ... Big and Pinky are the sum total of my toe knowledge. Your question can not be answered without a framework of why anarchy should or should not be used. Anarchy against oppression is good, anarchy for anarchy's sake destroys.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-28-2013, 01:09 PM
Post: #4
 
There are not "all the types." Anarchy just means no government over a society.

What you hear are a bunch of lying left wing media frauds trying to cover over Marxists (or other movements they might favor) rioting, killing people in their way, and assassinating people they hate. The media bigots don't want you to have the real view of their ultra-left wing political cousins (or others) so they pretend they are just generic "anarchists."

However when national socialist competitors, or other opponents to the international socialists most media operators are, they label then "Nazis." That German workers party is no longer viable nor even exists except for a very few kook tiny enclaves. Nazis were just a bizarre form of national socialist philosophy that became popular in Germany during the last desperate economic depression.

Virtually all economic philosophies, from communism to pure capitalism, can exist voluntarily under anarchy but it is antithetical to any political system. Once any political system is involved it is no longer anarchy.

PS: Karl Marx's ultimate social goal was voluntary anarchic communism. His followers trying to implement his philosophies have never gone beyond the "dictatorship of the proletariat" stage as could be predicted by most people except idealists like Marx. The proletariat leaders never give up their dictatorship. They, along with most citizens, also typically bleed their societies to economic death because they have the opportunity to access all its assets, unlike just segments of capital accessed only by their owners in more capitalist systems.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)