Is it possible to introduce progressive social measures without them being in the interests of capitalism?

[David M]

In our contemporary society, can action be taken by Government to raise the living standards of the working class without these actions having to be in the interest of the market economy?
If measures designed to create well-being amongst the people isn't progress, what is? And, why do you not want part of it?

[John B]

Been doing it for decades in the US. Just change the word progressive to socialist. It isn't progress to those of us who want no part of it!

[j2442j]

One problem is that in our contemporary society recognizing that a society exists doesn't exist because of persons with oedipal complexes.

Capitalism is deception about ownership of companies. There are all new companies, stores, restaurants, and banks every 4 years and an average employment duration of 1 year within false economics capitalism, (that is possibly a secret homelessness without health insurance death camp). Remaining solvent does not actually exist within false economics capitalism.

Get rich quick schemes in the capitalist business world, (buyouts, IPOs, conglomerates, acquisitions, mergers, and the stock market), do not actually work. Profit existing in the capitalist business world, or millionaires existing within capitalism, is pathological deception committed by the 21 organizations spying on the population with plain clothes agents, (with covert fake names and fake backgrounds).

Actual economics is the persons that are paying the business loans of companies voting at work in order to control the property they are paying for. The employees of companies are also paying the expenses of companies beyond the salary of the employees.

Capitalism is the psychology of imaginary parents, false economics, and the criminal deception of employees that are paying the bills (including the stocks and bonds, or shares) of companies.