You liberals are brainless!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?

[Chris]

the entire 47% criticism is absolutely disgusting it gets as much attention as it gets. Mitt simply stated a fact. there are 47% of Americans that will NOT vote for him. as well as there are 47% of Americans for the most part who will not vote for barack (southerners, religious). therefore there are 6% of Americans that are swingers if you will. they are the target market of the campaign. Mitt simply stated he cannot sway the 47%. He never said he hates, dislikes, disrespects, doesnt care ETC. from a campaign standpoint hes not going to waste money and try to sway them, they will not budge. the same for Obama. he doesn't waste campaign money on the south. Anyone who says he hates 47% of Americans is disgustingly ignorant and hateful of this man. anything he says is misconstrued and twisted by liberals.. ENOUGH OF THIS JOKE.. NOW FOR THE FACTS ABOUT THE TWO MEN.

Mitt is a flip flopper yes. but that has to do with the social issues (marriage, abortion). we are 16 trillion $ in debt at this point who has to worry about that.? those can be solved when the days are better and we can sleep knowing we are financially sound. Mitt has been 100% consistent on 1 thing. BUDGET! he has been consistent with FINANCIALS. thats what we need right now a man to save the economy. honestly nothing else matters at this point, let the states mandate everything else as it is right now.

- The facts are that mr obama has put us 5.3 trillion further in debt since his presidancy, while the unemployment rate has been steady at 8.7 % for 40 months now.. FACT.
- Bush put us in 4 trillion $ debt in 2 terms. as opposed to Obama 5 in 1 term. (please tell me how hes going to get us out of debt?)
- Obama health care plan is horrendous! it doesn't even cover everyone, and it requires many of happy employed Americans to change there plan. it also will consist of trillions of $ of tax payer money come January. Countries with free health care don't work. go look it up. the only successful country is Canada. but cancer patients and many others come to America for the correct treatment, that is not given there because the funding isn't high enough.. Listen its not like im opposed of liberal policies but unfortunately we don't live in a utopia and those policies cost a lot of money. me being a middle class 18 year old, my parents get taxed the hell out of. its scary we may be in trouble if we keep getting pounded by Obama taxes.
If there was a better spoken more professional republican candidate he would be leading the polls now. mitt just killed himself with his flip flops.

THESE ARE ALL 100% FACTS LOOK THEM UP. I KNOW I WILL HAVE LIBERALS BELOW COMMENTING SOME NONSENSE, BECAUSE I ALSO KNIOW FACTS DONT MATTER TO LIBERALS.. IF THE INTENTION IS RIGHT ITS RIGHT... THIS IS A CAPITALIST COUNTRY,.. BY GIVING YOUR BREAKING THE BACKS OF US THE MIDDLE CLASS.

- "NON RACIST SPANISH AMERICAN REPUBLICAN REALIST"

INSERT IGNORANT DELUSIONAL LIBERAL ANSWERS BELOW

VVVVVVVVVVVVVVV

[Matt]

Dude, they don't care about any of this. As long as they get their "free" handout, it's hear no evil, see no evil.

PROVE ME WRONG, LIBERALS.

[smallcelery283]

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/...s_ups.html

Game over.

The bigots in the Bible belt lose again.

[SSF Tofudebeast]

What do you mean by "Countries with free health care don't work."? Every first world country but the US has universal coverage, and in every single case it is far cheaper than what the US pays. Obamacare might not be perfect, but at least it's a step in the right direction.
http://www.lean.org/shook/displayobject.cfm?o=1274

And tell me how the heck Romney is going to pay down the debt? He says he wants to lower taxes on the wealthy and increase the military budget. How is that supposed to shrink the budget deficit?

[prettyexotic]

romney will shrink the budget by creating jobs not by creating handouts

[Chicago]

First of all, what exactly is you question?

Second of all, while I'm not a huge fan of either of the candidates, your rant was actually filled so hopelessly with inaccuracies and second- grade style grammar it actually made me cringe to think how many people in country like you will be voting this year.

Your first "fact" stated Romney said, in the most polite and respectful way, that 47% of people that did not pay income taxes were not his concern. Later you implied this 47% would be the ones voting for Obama, while the other 47%, the wealthier, well-educated ones, would vote for Romney. In reality, the states with highest concentration of the first, "unpatriotic" 47% are actually mostly Republic. Only one out of the top ten states in the study was Democratic. I'm not associated with either party, but even I can admit that sounds a little fishy. The majority of people that Romney famously criticized (yes, criticized) will be voting for him this November. My personal reasoning behind this is that many of Romney's supporters are actually quite ignorant to what this man's values are. An example of this I found pretty ironic was the group of gay men in the South who were helping with Romney's campaign, making buttons and putting them on their tank tops, oblivious to the fact that their choice for candidate got immense satisfaction from bullying gay peers, like John Lauber, as a student.

There are too many other foolish mistakes in this tirade for me to go through each one of them. Just the first one, from you very first line, will hopefully tell you something. Instead of memorizing statistics and eating the bs these politicians are spoon-feeding you, learn to think for yourself and research what each candidate in really made of. I, personally will not be voting this year because I am disappointed with both Obama and Romney. However, if you do decide to vote, more power to you. Just please do it intelligently.