Is U.S. social policy consistent with a free market, social democracy, or a corporate liberal interpretation?

[petitecattle999]

and why?

[Q]

corporatism.

[bluechristy]

Any US social policy has turned money lose and given the poor more money to spend which keeps people working and business's going .
Simple Logic .

[Cat Lover]

Corporate conservative interpretation. Corporations pull the strings in DC, with their campaign contributions, and their ability to put the economy at risk if they are not catered to.

As corporate heads become more and more isolated with stratospheric salary/benefits levels, the middle class, which was the core of the United States, shrinks.

In addition, there is a huge amount of corporate welfare.

The real question becomes what happens when the vast majority of consumers in the United States can no longer afford to buy the products being provided. Right now, a huge amount of what the United States does is simply the profits from shuffling around vast sums of money.

Yes, from the innovation of ideas, the United States still comes out ahead. But as educational opportunities shrink, how much longer?

[W.C. Felcher]

plutocracy