Compare old WWF/E to new WWE?

[Gunther Garfunkle]

I'm doing a paper on comparing two things from different time periods and I choose WWE.

so what would be three topics to compare from old and new WWE? Attitude Era Vs. PG rating for example.

[Barry]

Think of probably the ratings, gimmicks and themes

You could compare the ratings now to what they were
You can compare the difference in gimmicks between Steve Austin and John Cena
Obviously there's the mainstream media, and how much it has been promoted through sports, celebrities, and just throughout children
And you can compare themes like the toning down on nudity, profanity, and characters like Zeb Colter and the Real Americans

[Taufik]

01. WWF has multiple color ring ropes, WWE have same color ring ropes.
02. WWF has small crowd, WWE have bigger crowd.
03. WWF superstar has a different types of amazing gimmick, WWE superstar have same common gimmick.

[RIcky]

Attitude Era was the best.

[Anthony M]

WWF/E in 1996 to 2006: it was twice more worth watching because it's 100% edgier than it was during the entire 1979 to 1995 period. it has more championships, more wrestlers in the roster and plenty of match types during the span.

WWE in 2007 to Present: It's similar to the full mix of AWA wrestling[1980s to early 1990s], USWA wrestling[early to mid 1990s], WCW wrestling[1990s to early 2000s], XFL Football & World Bodybuliding Federation with an full ripoff combination touch of the Soap Opera, Independent film, Horror film, Mockumentary, Teen Drama, Variety Show, Social Media, Sci Fi Drama, Hidden Camera TV show, Mystery & Suspense TV show/movie, News Broadcast and Reality TV Show all in one. Many angles & storylines since 2007 are unwatchable, confusing and terrible while Most Gimmicks are completely stale and pathetic because it screw the company's own legacy up in my view.

WWF/E in 1996 to 2006>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>WWE in 2007 to ????