Why are caucasoids (white people) sexually very attractive? How have they genetically evolved to be attractive?

[crookedmap999]

[Global Domination]

Troll where are you statistical data figures that back up everyone or most believe Caucasians are attractive. 87% of the world is non-white as provided by the United Nations ethnic world census 2013 and the standard of beauty is tan skin and athleticism in which the the Caucasian ethnic group is proven not to have so much fit and physically attractive people

[Fireball]

HANDSOME PARENTS AND GOOD PERSONALITIES...

[broadflesh666]

It seems like all caucasoid groups can produce 10s though the average female attractiveness surely differs across groups. Salma Hayek is half lebanese half mexican. Monica Belluci is Italian and black haired. Aishwarya Rai is south Indian. Adriana Lima is a latina mix that includes black and native. Even Vanessa Williams looked like a 10 to me in the early 90s as her face is very caucasoid.

Personally, I’m not sure if Ive ever seen a 100% east asian or 100% sub saharan woman with a 10 face. But to me it looks like caucasoid groups can all produce beauties of the same grade A+ caliber. Across different caucasoid groups, 10s look sort of similar to each other despite the difference in skin tone. They seem to be the standard of beauty, not a particular race.

There are three methods for determining if a race’s women are the globalized gold standard in physical attractiveness:

1. Direct measurement

There is substantial evidence that beauty is quantifiable and measurable. Direct measurement of various facial ratios found in women from around the world would tell us which race’s women came closest to meeting the beauty ideal. This method would result in the most accurate results, but many religious believers in equalism would go to their graves denying in the face (heh) of all scientific evidence and common sense that beauty has an objective basis. It is likely this sort of scientific inquiry will not be done in our lifetimes.

2. Media exposure

The premise is simple: The most desirable women are the ones most represented in mass media as icons of beauty. If Unavision and Korean beauty pageants are any indication, white women (and facsimiles of white women) are beloved in large swaths of the non-white world. In fact, based on media presence, it seems the only areas of the world where the beauty of white women *isn’t* idealized are in the homelands of whites: the Anglosphere and Europe.

The downside to using this method to determine white women’s relative attractiveness is the result-skewing effects of propaganda. The media both reflects cultural taste, and molds it in the image that the gatekeepers of social discourse want it to go. So a media blitz to, say, elevate the desirability of Aboriginal women would not be fairly representative of their attractiveness to the world’s men.

3. Male preference

Outside of direct measurement, this is the method that will yield results closest to reality. Watch what men do, not what they say. Which women do men from around the world prefer to gaze at? Which women do men prefer to bang? Marry? Etc. For that, we can look at porn stats to see if white women are disproportionately represented. Another method is to examine the historical sex slavery data to find out, contra FeministX, if white women have or haven’t been the “gold standard” in attractiveness for a long time.

Peter Frost has a series of post looking into this very question, and the results are sure to stick another shiv into the black hearts of beauty relativists: White women (and whiter women) have historically been desired as concubines and sex slaves by non-white men.

---------------------------------------------------------------0o*o0------------------------------------------------------------------

Putting it all together — (limited) direct measurement data, total media exposure, and male preference (both current and historical) — the conclusion is hard to escape: White women are indeed the global gold standard in beauty. There are exceptions, of course, and not every white woman is beautiful (far from it, and less so today thanks to the obesity epidemic), but on a large scale analysis, white women appear to be the women that all the world’s men want, and the women that the world’s women want to be.

[Sara]

beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. I saw a picture of a native American girl and I thought she was the prettiest lady and wish my red hair and freckles was on someone else. But my native American husband who is so attractive finds my hair pretty and my freckles cute. So being pale is not always attractive to everyone. I hate it.

[natanya]

You have a wharp idea of "caucasiod." Africa does not have one look. There were people with what you refer to as "caucosoid" long before there were even Europeans. Even thay have African ancestry! Europeans are genectically homogenous because they are the youngest human population on Earth. They can only be European. By comparison Africans are the most genectically diverers human populatios and preceed them by over 60000 years or more. They are the only group capable of producing human diversities The North Africans" there now are not indiginous to Africa at all. In fact caucosoids, whites Europeans do not come from Africa but came from people who came from Africa as they migrated out and off the continant and relocated other parts of the world Middle East folks are not originaly there etheir. But a mixture of conquring Greco-Roman armies under Alexander the Great and so on. Most Arabs test + for Greco-Roman ancestry, In fact the word "arab" means "mixed" and it is Greek. Why people think they are Semetic is beyond me. Since color consciouness people were taught to think in the terms you do now. Grow up! There are books you might like
Roots of the Right" J.Authe de Gorbinau and his "Inequalities of the Races" this are what started people like you on their way to this thinking format.