Twitist Forums
What do you think of WWE being PG rating? - Printable Version

+- Twitist Forums (http://twitist.com)
+-- Forum: Twitter forums (/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: Twitter General help (/forum-6.html)
+--- Thread: What do you think of WWE being PG rating? (/thread-56211.html)

Pages: 1 2


- 18 gibbs 20 - 01-20-2013 11:11 PM

It's far better than 2x4's wrapped in barbed wire actually being allowed in a wrestling ring. That was just sick.


- Moe Money - 01-20-2013 11:11 PM

As far as it being PG goes, it really does not phase me.

The fact that the entire product has taken a nosedive ever since is the problem. Very little amount of special matches outside of pay-per-views (they can't even give us Tornado tags anymore), Very high predictability during segments and in ring, awful booking and overpushing wrestlers that don't need it, terrible management decisions, and so many more factors that can be listed. RAWs ratings are dropping and it hasn't improved at all since it went three hours. If they cannot fix themselves in their current state, then they can at least go back to the way they used to be (any moment in time before 2009 is better than the WWE is now).


- Michael - 01-20-2013 11:11 PM

it ok to me pl0x of corse the attitude era is better...