This Forum has been archived there is no more new posts or threads ... use this link to report any abusive content
==> Report abusive content in this page <==
Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why did Obama let the Social security number Identification case go into default yesterday?
05-01-2013, 05:47 PM
Post: #1
Why did Obama let the Social security number Identification case go into default yesterday?
Obama has a lawyer

Ads

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
05-01-2013, 05:51 PM
Post: #2
 
Link please.

Ads

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
05-01-2013, 06:01 PM
Post: #3
 
what ?

Is this part of the birther conspiracy ?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
05-01-2013, 06:09 PM
Post: #4
 
Why do people like you assume that Obama, or any president, micro manages everything that happens in Washington? That's ridiculous.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
05-01-2013, 06:16 PM
Post: #5
 
HE CANNOT DEFEND IT!

******

This being the case, I asked Daniels to guide me through the data mine field and help me ascertain what we know for sure about the world’s best-known Social Security number – 042-68-4425.

“All I can say,” says Daniels of 042-68-4425, “is that it’s phony and [Obama] has been using it, with it first appearing on his Selective Service document in 1980.”

Daniels sent me a copy of the hand-written application of the individual who held the number immediately before Obama’s, 042-68-4424. The applicant, Thomas Wood, died at age 19, which is why his information is available.

Wood’s Social Security number was issued sometime between March and May of 1977. Obama would turn 16 in August of that year. Wood lived on Glenview Drive in Newington, Conn., the state from which all “042s” applied. Obama lived in Hawaii.

True to form, the left-leaning media set out to undermine the Social Security controversy and ridicule the investigators. Revealing, however, is the weakness of the response.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2011/03/275861/#rOqHURsqEwxU7pAj.99
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
05-01-2013, 06:27 PM
Post: #6
 
He didn't. Judge England certainly hasn't issued a notice of default -- Orly Taitz filed a request for a default, the court didnt order one. Her "proposed order" isn't signed by a judge. The only signatures are Orly Taitz and the person who sent the document to all the parties. The title even says "Request for a default judgment and a Proposed Default Judgment."

Obama hasn't even been properly served in this case, so he can't possibly have defaulted. Taitz claimed to have served Obama in his private capacity -- but she hasn't personally served him. She DID serve the Attorney General on January 4, which means she served Obama in his capacity as President. In that case, he gets 60 days to respond.

@RLP --Susan Daniel's errors. http://www.thefogbow.com/special-reports...ty-number/

You're going to be shocked when this case is dismissed -- like 200 cases before it -- aren't you?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)