Twitist Forums / Twitter forums / Twitter privacy v / Is the privacy of a few rich celebs more important than 1 million poor non-celebs?



This Forum has been archived there is no more new posts or threads ... use this link to report any abusive content
==> Report abusive content in this page <==
Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is the privacy of a few rich celebs more important than 1 million poor non-celebs?
11-09-2012, 10:18 PM
Post: #1
Chosen Man Offline
Newbie
*
 		Posts: 0
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 0
Is the privacy of a few rich celebs more important than 1 million poor non-celebs?
With some idiot, with the help of an idiot judge, trying to get the private details of more than a million users of twitter, facebook etc. It begs the question, are rich celebs (actors, footballers, judges, MPs and sundry others) entitled to more privacy than some poor person who cannot afford to fight for their privacy?

Your thoughts please.
Ads
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Is the privacy of a few rich celebs more important than 1 million poor non-celebs? - Chosen Man - 11-09-2012 10:18 PM
[] - hello - 11-09-2012, 10:26 PM
[] - scooter - 11-09-2012, 10:26 PM
[] - Poppy - 11-09-2012, 10:26 PM
[] - oldgrumpy - 11-09-2012, 10:26 PM
[] - Ms. GTO - 11-09-2012, 10:26 PM
[] - Puppy Dangerous - 11-09-2012, 10:26 PM
[] - English Gremlin - 11-09-2012, 10:26 PM
[] - dobrid1 - 11-09-2012, 10:26 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | Twitist Forums | Return to Top | Return to Content | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication