do you think that sites like facebook and tuiter should close down as David Cameron says?

[Oliver Cromwell]

Without a doubt, most definitely Facebook.

From what was initially supposed to be a site like Friends Re United.

Facebook has got to much power, notice every advert you see, the business does not have a website it is always, facebook.com/pepsi, not the firms own website.

Facebook groups are getting to powerful, this is far more than a social network, this is a big part of society, a wrong part of society and it should at the very least be a subscription service, i would prefer a total ban but atleast if it was a pay for service it would eliminate the chavvy vile scum that use it.

The Labour/Jeremy kyle society louts who sit around drinking cider all day sit on the thing, mothers abandoning their children just because they are to busy on fcuking Facebook.

It needs to go, a nasty and addictive site that is a dagger into decent society!!

Twitter on the other hand I think is a good way of keeping up with the news, however I think there should be more censorship.

[Jonathan Bachelor]

I wonder if he would suggest that if it was a UK site. Why should facebook lose millions just because rioters are using it to communicate? And think of all the people worldwide that haven't done anything wrong that would miss out. David Cameron has some very strange ideas sometimes.

What next? Cut the phone lines?

[master feed troll]

in a free society, david cameron should have a bullet in his head right now.