Since the Bible says that when Jesus come back he will rule for 1000 years, will he try to set up a Socialist?

[Mitten of Kolob]

Gevernment, or will we have Free Market Capitalism?

Jesus being in charge of the economy would cause trouble with all his talk about the poor and all.

If he tries to expand Entitlement Programs like Social Security and have Universal Health Care, would we have a revolt and throw his asse out?
Would would pay for all this?

[Mary]

It is a moot point. Jesus is not coming back.

[AquaC]

Well if people are poor and hungry he can just make some fish and bread some wine too

[Dinamuk Roberts]

If it is a Socialist Government --- that will mean Slavery and No Freedom.

Heaven will be like North Korea, which is the Most Successful Socialist Nation in the History Of The World.

You are nerdy.

[fatlaborer058]

It will be a feudalist kingdom, not a democracy. The peasents live to serve the lords.

[Chloe]

Jesus would not deny anyone food and all sick and infirm would be treated.

[GINGER]

There will not be any poor.

[. Smith]

Perhaps you don't care,but you are dangerously close to acting in a blasphemous nature. There are many ways to express your opinion without insulting the entities that you have done here.It is a reckless and unnecessary way to get your dislike for a society that does have compassion for all citizens across.I find it senseless to bring the bible jesus,and ultimately God almighty into your selfish view of our society.You make reference to Social Security into your damning of the social safety net that maintains a society with unwanted poverty among the elderly.Your reference to social security as an entitlement is a true observation.It is an entitlement because those that receive it are entitled to the benefits,having contributed to the fund their entire working life.The government does not participate in the funds that the recipients receive as all funds are generated from payroll taxes that are payed 1/2 by the worker and the other 1/2 by the employer.The only involvement the government has in this process is the receiving and distribution of these funds.They have been dipping into the fund to bolster other tax needs,an unlawful act that they have been getting away with for decades.But i get the impression that you feel these people should not receive their benefits even though they have been paying for them since they first applied for a social security card.You are ignorant of the facts,as well as the effect that not helping those in need would seriously damage the economy.this is why social security was formed in the first place,to prevent poverty at the time when one can no longer work.Add to that your lack of compassion and the need to bring god into your argument,and you paint yourself as a person without knowledge or compassion,and will use the most despicable means to make your selfish and foolish opinions.All economists acknowledge the importance of social security to a stable economy and that things such as food stamps are an investment in our own society.So turn on FOX news for more opinions that you are not educated enough to arrive at on your own.