Why do Iibs tout the benefits of a govt provided military then fight to cut its funding?
|
05-27-2013, 09:58 AM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
Why do Iibs tout the benefits of a govt provided military then fight to cut its funding?
Ads |
|||
05-27-2013, 10:07 AM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
They don't
Ads |
|||
05-27-2013, 10:09 AM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
military pork is still pork.
|
|||
05-27-2013, 10:10 AM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
straw man
I know I dont to hell with the military civil defence coastguard police thatll do |
|||
05-27-2013, 10:12 AM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
Its the waste and the rip off by the GOP controlled military industrial complex. Gop greed once again
|
|||
05-27-2013, 10:21 AM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
Liberals, progressives, and socialists don't have much respect for military except as it serves their doctrines. Conservatives show it more respect but traditionally they want it for its standard purpose: to secure the nation, its resources, and its commerce.
Below are accurate definitions. Today in the US most progressives and some socialists fraudulently call themselves "liberal." True liberalism advocates: individual freedom, weak government, and free markets. Progressives advocate: social concern, omniscient government, and controlled markets. Socialism advocates: social responsibility, omnipresent government, and collective markets. Conservatism advocates: moral responsibility, strong government, and protected markets ("neo-cons" with international businesses have adopted freer market policies). |
|||
05-27-2013, 10:25 AM
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
To feed the Military Industrial Complex.
|
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)