Politics: Do you agree with liberals that their should be MASSIVE POLICE PRESENCE instead of armed citizens?

[GOD]

http://news.yahoo.com/dianne-feinstein-p...25z;_ylv=3


This is what martial law look like! Going door-to-door breaking in without warrant!
http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/ba...d_04192013

[john]

Yes a peoples/citizens liberation army for defense purposes within the state.

[Time]

I'm not going to agree with the person who can't distinguish the difference between "there" and "their."

[Psilocybin Ponyâ„¢]

Yes, this isn't the Wild West.

[Athena]

Well, um, yes, THAT IS was "martial law" is.

So, you would let a murder run free for the sake of your closed door?
Death is a small price to pay?
That is your argument right now?

Release the boy as a national hero?
You may find a hard argument to support that policy.

[Smoking Joe]

You don't like the police. We understand you are an anti-government, anti-military, anti-police conservative.

[Belovedgovernor621]

It's not liberals that want a massive police presence. It's c0ns that want to use a massive police presense to monitor every pregnancy; to intrude in women's private medical decisions; and to monitor and prevent loving gay families from marrying. That's the kind of Big Government Police State the majority of Americans do not want.

[Dangerous Mr.]

Yes Vigilante group is a synonym for armed citizens

[SmartAZ]

You can't trust cops. They have an absolutely lousy reputation.

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_q...+spray+cop

[DASHA]

no