Is Progressive social change, i.e. Big Government Liberalism, compatible with Free-Market Capitalism?
|
10-13-2012, 07:31 PM
Post: #11
|
|||
|
|||
Progressive social change is absolutely incompatible with the idea that YOU are not government PROPERTY.
Clearly you need to check a fact. With more "conservative" policy comes more prosperity across ALL income groups. More conservative policy means more employment, higher wages, easier upward mobility and indeed all of the things "Progressives" claim they want yet have never delivered. Progressives themselves OPENLY disdain markets, capitalism and upward mobility. Their STATED goal is for a ruling elite to utterly CONTROL the general population by locking us into permanent and desperate poverty. Ads |
|||
10-13-2012, 07:31 PM
Post: #12
|
|||
|
|||
When America finally won the Cold War at the beginning of the 90's, we believed it was a victory for Anglo-American free market capitalism. Since then, other forms of capitalism which involve a much greater participation of governments have evolved. Think of Singapore, China, Brazil, India, and Europe, especially the north. All have greater growth rates and more stable economies, and higher employment, not to mention less income inequality in most cases and a more satisfied citizenry. In other terms, when it comes to capitalism, we have the least government involvement, the lowest taxes, and we're getting our collective asses kicked because of ideological arrogance.
It's time to THINK DIFFERENT. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)