This Forum has been archived there is no more new posts or threads ... use this link to report any abusive content
==> Report abusive content in this page <==
Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What is more important - learning how to use Twitter or learning about history?
11-27-2012, 06:48 AM
Post: #1
What is more important - learning how to use Twitter or learning about history?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtec...ians.htmlw

Ads

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 06:57 AM
Post: #2
 
twitter however one day it will be history so everyones a winner

Ads

Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 06:57 AM
Post: #3
 
The review doesn't really make it mandatory that children should learn about Twitter, rather:

"Computer skills are usually not taught until secondary school but Sir Jim has advised lessons should begin earlier."
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 06:57 AM
Post: #4
 
History is the single most important subject that any school can offer.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 06:57 AM
Post: #5
 
It should not take a long time to learn to 'Tweet", but history is a long term thing. I don't see where it would be one or the other. It's like saying should somebody learn to use a computer or learn English. You can do both and it might help if some of the computer saavy types could spell and use grammar, too. Texting and tweeting are great things today for quick and instant communication, but it seems to be taking away the ability to actually write.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 06:57 AM
Post: #6
 
We must face the possibility that the abbreviated signaller's English used for texting & tweeting, however useful in context, has a malign influence on linguistic development. The ability to choose words with appropriate connotations to express, accurately and concisely, shades of meaning and attitudes is not developed if telegram-writing is the preeminent mode of communication.

If this is true (and it probably is) then not only History but other humanities including language and literature should take priority.

Children will learn to 'tweet', only too willingly, in their own time. School exists to transmit skills and knowledge that children might not otherwise acquire.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 06:57 AM
Post: #7
 
Twitter is miniscule and trivial.

"Those who do not study history are condemned to repeat it."
- George Santayana
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 06:57 AM
Post: #8
 
History

simply because Twitter will be replaced by something better in a year or two at the utmost (I still remember having to learn MS-DOS commands) - while learning history (and thus the quality of brain contents) will last them a lifetime
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 06:57 AM
Post: #9
 
History is most important simply because you need to know your past to understand the present. Cause and effect. Plus, History repeats itself it's a cycle and if you understand it, you may be even able to predict future events with certainty.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-27-2012, 06:57 AM
Post: #10
 
I tried twitter and can't make head nor tail of it. 'history' covers many different subjects. Much of it is based on supposition and the culture writing it. Wars really do annoy me. Studying a subject of interest and filled with facts I looked forward too knowing more, along came King whatsit and destroyed everything. Oh No, bye bye to my fact finding.
Reading histoiry provides insight into the utter stupidity of man also the the great bravery,
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)