Do you agree government should NOT be offering social services at tax payer expense?
|
10-14-2012, 02:08 AM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
Government ruined health care with HMOs? Whaaaaat? HMOs are options. Do you even know what an HMO is? Hope you come down with something that rings up $200,000 in medical bills and CIGNA cuts you off retroactively.
If you'd use your brain sometime, you'd see that if the government provided universal health care and bid the administration out to the insurance companies, for a profit, that health care for everyone would be much better. Plus, employer provided medical insurance is one of the major reasons why the U. S. can't compete globally any more. Every major corporation and municipality who self insures does that and their costs per person are lower than average. For THAT there is no argument. YOU have just been proven wrong, by logic. And people wonder why I'm so angry all the time. Also, I like the logic of your question. How is the government going to provide social services if not at tax payer expense? |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Do you agree government should NOT be offering social services at tax payer expense? - Barry Fail - 10-14-2012, 02:00 AM
[] - Bad Αss - 10-14-2012 02:08 AM
[] - Commander McBragg - 10-14-2012, 02:08 AM
[] - zealoussofa934 - 10-14-2012, 02:08 AM
[] - The K!LLER Anna - 10-14-2012, 02:08 AM
[] - iwasnotanazipolka - 10-14-2012, 02:08 AM
[] - Emile Stonewall - 10-14-2012, 02:08 AM
[] - Foolishpancake065 - 10-14-2012, 02:08 AM
[] - grrdsantana - 10-14-2012, 02:08 AM
[] - Master Sidious - 10-14-2012, 02:08 AM
[] - livelygrass477 - 10-14-2012, 02:08 AM
[] - Ryan Jansen - 10-14-2012, 02:08 AM
[] - PTSD is BS - 10-14-2012, 02:08 AM
[] - Defending Sanity - 10-14-2012, 02:08 AM
[] - chris tanzu - 10-14-2012, 02:08 AM
[] - spot the cat - 10-14-2012, 02:08 AM
[] - falsi fiable - 10-14-2012, 02:08 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)